User talk:Walkazo/Archive 8
| Archives
|
|---|
Status: As always, school keeps me too busy for social calls, but if you have any questions about the Super Mario Wiki, feel free to ask away - I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
Ridley Proposal Extended...
My bad dude...
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 14:05, 4 March 2011 (EST)
- *dudette
- But anyway, it's no problem; we haven't had an extension in months, so there was nothing for you to go on: I don't think it says to show the extension in the rules (it's just an unwritten style thing). - Walkazo 14:13, 4 March 2011 (EST)
Okay, cool...um, I have another question (I know, big surprise, right? :D), can u just make a new category on anything u think there should be a category about?
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 00:17, 5 March 2011 (EST)
- Depends on the type of category. If there's only a few pages that would go in it, it's probably not a good idea; other than that, it'll probably be allowed, but I can't say for certain without knowing any specifics - it's not a subject that lends itself to generalities. Why, are you thinking of making a couple categories? - Walkazo 00:27, 5 March 2011 (EST)
Yeah, I was thinking one for Books, and one for Giant Creatures...
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 00:30, 5 March 2011 (EST)
- We've actually decided to use Category:Publications, rather than Template:Fakelink around the wiki (we used to have a "books" category, but it was deleted in 2009). IIRC, "Publications" was chosen because it avoids the possible confusion about whether the category is talking about in-universe books or actual RL books, and it incorporates a broader range of things (i.e. comics, compilations of comics, magazines), which makes it more useful as a navigation tool. I can see where you're coming from with the Giant Creatures category, but you'd have to be really specific (i.e. it's "giant" forms of standard enemies, rather than large creatures in general, since that would probably be considered unnecessary), and even then, it might not be accepted. You might want to consult another Sysop before making such a category. - Walkazo 00:50, 5 March 2011 (EST)
Yeah, see what I was talking about was in-universe books, but I was only able to find four books that would fit into that category, though I'm sure there are more, 'cuz there's tons of Mario games I've never even played before... :)
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 01:06, 5 March 2011 (EST)
- I actually doubt that there's enough in-universe books to justify making an entire category for them. - Walkazo 01:15, 5 March 2011 (EST)
Good point...
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 01:27, 5 March 2011 (EST)
Hello Again
- Its me DKC2 King Liam with a different username. Hows stuff going?
Kaptain K. Rool 
- "school keeps me too busy for social calls" - Walkazo 15:19, 6 March 2011 (EST)
- Um... you are online. Can you explain what you mean? Kaptain K. Rool
- School keeps me busy a lot, so when I do make it online, I want to do work, not waste my time chit-chatting. - Walkazo 15:22, 6 March 2011 (EST)
- Um... you are online. Can you explain what you mean?
- "school keeps me too busy for social calls" - Walkazo 15:19, 6 March 2011 (EST)
"Title Screen" stuff
No offense, obviously, but the person who's been uploading screenshots of title screens has been doing so very frequently as compared to the majority of screenshots we have of actual gameplay. I did tell the person in question that in the future to not just upload title screens alone for that doesn't do the articles in the mainspace justice. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 12:58, 7 March 2011 (EST)
- But I don't see why title screens "don't do the articles" justice. Sure they don't show gameplay, but they do show a perfectly valid (and interesting, imho) aspect of the game. What's the harm? - Walkazo 13:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)
What now...?
So now that this has already been extended an extra week, is it still considered to be a tie, or not?
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 01:33, 11 March 2011 (EST)
- It gets extended for another week. If it's still tied by the end of the 17th, it'll have to be extended again (and again, and again, and again until a consensus is reached). - Walkazo 01:39, 11 March 2011 (EST)
Omg! I'm almost starting to wish I hadn't proposed it in the first place... :D
PHOENIX (talk • edits) 01:45, 11 March 2011 (EST)
Birdo^_^
Hiya Walkazo, what's wrong with my recent edit on Bido's article?? =0 
Birdobeauties
I'm not lying =/
- Your observation may be valid, but the specifics of how she runs isn't really important to the reader's understanding of Birdo, and it breaks up the flow of the paragraph, which is focusing on her personality (running around and waving her arms from side to side doesn't exactly invoke the idea of her exuding beauty). - Walkazo 19:03, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
{{personal-image}}
You've recently 2 years ago protected the Template:Personal-image. You see, the idea of "This image belongs to blablabla, etc." is incorrect. For example, if someone wants to upload audio file (*.ogg), he can't place this template because there's that "image" thing. Can you edit this so it says "This file belongs to blablabla, etc."? SWFlash
- But the entire template is about images, not just that one line: altering that first use of "file" won't change the fact that a personal image template is being used on a completely different form of media. I can see the wisdom of counting personal image and audio files together, but right now, the entire system of organization is not set up to do that. You should suggest adding a line about audio files to MarioWiki:Personal Images on its talk page if you really want to change things, but I don't really see the point. Does anyone even have a personal audio file? Would anyone ever want one? Most of the time, users can just embed a YouTube video to share songs/themes they like, and frankly, it's preferable that they do that, instead of uploading a song themselves (saving on server space, and whatnot). - Walkazo 18:53, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
