MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Koopa Paratroopa

Koopa Paratroopa

Support

1. KS3 (talk) A great article with a lot of pictures, minimal amount of errors, and everything needed for a great FA.
2. Toadwell (talk)
3. Alpha 315 (talk)
4. Volatile Dweevil (talk)

Oppose

1. Reversinator (talk) Some of the sections are one-liners, and there are some grammatical errors as well.
2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Why is there a messed-up looking Paper Mario statistics section? Some sections are very short and others can use a little more images.
3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though I like Paratroopa, I don't think this should be featured. Some info is missing. One example is New Super Mario Bros. Wii (and some others, but I added some too).
4. Commander Code-8 (talk) Per all
5. Booderdash (talk) Has very little of it real appearences, and the Mario Party section is HORRIBLE with missing some appearences there.
6. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - Expand in a lot more sections, more pictures could be placed in the article, missing info, etc etc etc.
7. NARCE (talk)

Removal of Opposes

Narce

1. User:Booderdash all information is ingame and no sources are needed.

Comments

@Commander Code-8: Well, it actually does have a good amount of images. Bloc Partier (talk)

TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I don't think it's fixed. I think the idea is to put the two right next to each other, so the page isn't so long. I didn't see it before, though, so I could be wrong. Bloc Partier (talk)

I attempted to do that, but I couldn't. At least it's better than the last one; that's a real mess. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Yeah, it would be even better if they were all next to each other, but thanks anyway. Removing my vote. Time Q (talk)

Hmmm... We got it fixed on the Dry Bones article, if I remember correctly. I'll try to fix it. Bloc Partier (talk)

Alrighty, the template issue is resolved. Please tell me if it doesn't work for you. Bloc Partier (talk)

Well, I believe that the Super Paper Mario stats should get placed next to the Paper Mario, so that it doesn't look like a mess but I'm also not sure what comes first, neatness or chronological order. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I think so that chronological order comes first, but it would look neater if the Super Paper Mario stats are placed next to the Paper Mario one. KS3 (talk)

Everyone, the PM stats are fixed. KS3 (talk)

@BLOF: I don't think it looks messy at all... And I think chronology always comes first. Bloc Partier (talk)

He said missing, not messy. Reversinator (talk)

I was actually just referring to his statement roughly 5 lines above this one. Bloc Partier (talk)

5 lines above is my statement, it would be like 11 or so to BWOF's statement. KS3 (talk)

I came back here and found my oppose vote removed. A I allowed to vote again or does it have to stay removed? Commander Code-8 (talk)

You can vote again. KS3 (talk)

Lacks any form of references. Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances." Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed. - NARCE 03:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)