MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Boo

Boo

Support

1. Boo is a good article will lots of information and not to long. RedBoo64 (talk)
2. Boo is a famous enemy with a page that is not too short, not too long, and it has lotsa info.GameMaster (talk)
3. Boo should be a feature article its well writen with good pics.MarioPartyFanactic77 (talk)
4. Boo is a well written article and deserves to be feautured, He rocks! Commander Buzz (talk)
5. Deserves to be Featured. Dry Paratroopa (talk)
6. Mario64fanatic (talk) Boo should be a featured article because of all the info on Boo and still being an article that's not to long to read. Also Boo is cool!
7. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Per all. The article is good, written well.
8. This is a good article, contains lots of information and a decent amount of links. 188seth (talk)
9. This is an awesome article, It has lots of info and good pics.Yuiy (talk)
10. Per all Marioguy1 (talk)
11. Per All SpriteYoshi (talk)
12. Personally I think that even though the page has a few problems, they could be easily fixed, and the article itself is great. -Doopliss rocks
13. How could you not nominate something as cute as Boo? --Commander Victor Lightning
14. Why not, boo is a great character, especially in the spin-offs; Article passes FA requirements Baby Mario Bloops (talk)
15. Boo is a good article. Nuff' said. Ohforf3 (talk)
16. [[Boo is a wonderful article no matter what anyone else says!!! g.narron (talk)

Oppose

1. In its current state, the article is not fit to be featured. Almost every section needs some help with grammar, size, and formatting. Also, the "The Appearance of a Boo" section either needs deletion or improvement. The lead at the beginning of the article also needs major improvement. Bloc Partier (talk)
2. Urm, isn't Yoshi's Island DS supposed to be near the beginning? Also Super Mario World2:Yoshi's Island doesn't say ALL the boos that appear in the game. Also NSMB section needs more work. Super mario fan (talk)
3. The History section needs a lot of work Dark Lakitu 789 (talk)
4. I agree with Bloc Partier. This article has a TON of errors. Just look around. DON'T SUPPORT IT JUST BECAUSE IT LOOKS LONG OR YOU JUST LIKE BOO We might end up with a featured article with too many spelling errors...Fawfulfury65 (talk)
5. Oh. My. God. WWWWWHHHHHYYYYYYYYYY TTTHHHHEEEEEE HEEEEEELLLLL ARE THERE SO MANY FAN VOTES?!?!?! This is a very erroneous article with many mistakes that need to be fixed before it gets even close to being a featured article. Electrobomber (talk)
6. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Some parts of the history section needs a lot of work.
7. Shyster66 (talk) There are tons of mistakes. The Yoshi Island artical has two sections!