MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!" "Vote" periods last for one week. All past proposals are archived. A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{user|User name}}. Signing with the signature code ~~~(~) is not allowed due to technical issues. How To Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument. Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at: Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm) Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm) Sunday: 15:00 (3pm) Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has no merit or was cast in bad faith. However, there must be strong reasons supporting the invalidation. "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line. At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community. Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion. All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a sysop, the proposer can ask for that help. The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. Also, NO PROPOSALS ABOUT HAVING BANJO AND CONKER ARTICLES -The Management. CURRENTLY: 08:18, 23 November 2024 (EDT) New Features New Way of Polling! I think we should have an easier way of voting for the mario wiki awards I am hosting a website for free at freewebs that has the polls on it, the website is under construction. I was woundering if you here at the wiki would like to use it. This new way of voting is easy to count (it shows the results) and it is also has an easy "click the circle" type of voting. Anyone can edit it and the login, the login information is: Username: SuperMarioWiki Password: mariowiki E-mail: theusedslash07@aim.com (need permission to use marioawards@gmail.com) Website URL: http://www.freewebs.com/supermariowiki/ So what do you say MarioWiki users? Yay or nay?theused (talk) Proposer: Theused (talk) Deadline: June 15, 2008, 15:00 Yay Theused (talk) Clay Mario (talk) Per the fact that I need an alternative way of voting, and this would be a great way! MegaMario9910 (talk) Per Theused and Clay Mario. The easier, the better. Iron Maiden (talk) Per Theused, Clay Mario, and MegaMario9910 because it's a great solution...If the link wasn't an error. Nay Toadette 4evur (talk) - Like IS said in the comments, Wayoshi already has things figured out. It isn't really that hard to Email or PM your votes to Wayo, the system we have now is fine. Joining the forum takes about 2 minutes, that's all Glitchman (talk) - Better to let Wayoshi handle things, he's the director. Even if this proposal passes, I doubt it'll be valid. Jdrowlands (talk) – The results are meant to be kept secret. Showing the results would sorta spoil it. Also, per Glitchman. Wayo is the director after all Pokemon DP (talk) Per all, especially Jdrow's "secret results" comment. Blitzwing (talk) - Per Jdrowlands. Also, Wayo's gave atleast three way of voting (Chat, Email, or Forum). One of them should work. MelissaMarioSister (talk) - Per Jdrowlands. I think it'd be more exciting if we didn't know what the results were until the very end. Comments Attention the link has been fixed The preceding unsigned comment was added by Theused (talk). Um... Wayo has this all figured out... I don't think we need a new system... InfectedShroom (talk) I can't seem to access the site. It gives me an error page. MelissaMarioSister (talk) Same. MegaMario9910 (talk) I think it should just be Wayoshi who decides this. Paper Jorge (talk) I'm not going to vote for this, because: Well, as some people mentioned before, Wayonaise is in charge but on the other hand, the reason I'm not voting is becuase of the tediousness of the voting process. It seems to be a lot easier on the site. If we could hide the votes, and have Wayo in charge of the polls, maybe... because it is, afterall, the "fill-out-this-form-and-press-submit easy way" that Wayo said was impossible. The one flaw about the site thing is that there's no way to vote for "other". But oh well. I really still don't know which side on. Marcelagus (T • C • E) Removals None at the moment. Splits & Merges Merge "Blank" Yoshi with Yoshi (species) I said something about this a loooong time ago, before this proposal system had even been invented. Now that is HAS, I figured I'd better do things officialy (plus I was to lazy to do it before). I think that we should merge the articles for Red Yoshi, Yellow Yoshi, Brown Yoshi, etc., into the Yoshi (species) article. My basis for this is mainly the Koopa Troopa & Shy Guy article. We don't have articles for all of THEIR different colors. The different colored Yoshi's have only shown individuality in one game, plus Yoshi's (and shy guys, now that I think of it) have actually been seen changing colors. Aye or Nay? Proposer: User: Ultimatetoad Deadline: June 15, 15:00 Aye User: Ultimatetoad Knife (talk) 15:32, 8 June 2008 (EDT) Per Ultimatetoad Nay KP Blue (talk) - Its not like the different colors just green yoshis that got shot with a paintball gun enough times to completely cover them with the substance inside of the paintalls. The different colors of yoshi are all different subspecies and on Wikipedia they don't just merge all of the subpecies onto one article. It makes us look unprofessional. Bob-omb buddy (talk)-If we did this we may as well merge Micro Goomba to Goomba. Cobold (talk) - They are characters in SMW. Stumpers (talk) - "The different colored Yoshi's have only shown individuality in one game" Actually, they've showed up in three. Besides, color changing Yoshi's can't swim either. The Yoshis you're refering to can swim very, very well. They are individual characters, too. InfectedShroom (talk) - Per all and the fact that this proposal didn't go through last time... -_- Clay Mario (talk) - Per Stumpers Time Q (talk): Per Stumpers. They're clearly distinct enough to have separate articles. Pokemon DP (talk) Per all. Walkazo (talk) - Per all. Comments We already had exactly the same proposal, and it was rejected. - Cobold (talk) Yeah. Do we really need to go through it all again? InfectedShroom (talk) I don't think there's a rule about that. Votes might change in the future.Knife (talk) 15:32, 8 June 2008 (EDT) Really? I've seen a couple proposals deleted cuz they had already been decided... Ah well. InfectedShroom (talk) It's been about five months since the last proposal. I guess it's cool. -- Chris 05:21, 9 June 2008 (EDT) Stumpers: What three games? The only one I can think of is SMW. SMSunshine does not count, as it was always a green yoshi who just change colors. In SMW2 we have no no proof that it was the same red yoshi/pink yoshi/green yoshi every time. And in Yoshi's Story, ALL of the playable Yoshi's were supposedly a completly new cast of baby yoshi's, complicating things extremly. - Ultimatetoad I don't see what you're getting at... - Walkazo (talk) Changes Last names from Super Mario Movie For some time now, I've seen last names for Mario and Luigi to be Mario Mario, or Luigi Mario, taken from the movie. I don't really consider the movie canon, because they were never proven in games. So I am proposing that we take away the last names from the movie. Proposer: Clay Mario Deadline: June 14, 2008, 20:00 Take away the last names from the movie Clay Mario (talk) - Per my proposal KP Shadow (talk) - Per Clay Mario. Glitchman (talk) - Per Clay Mario. Yoshitheawesome (talk) - Per all. Dryest bowser-per CM Bob-omb buddy (talk)-Per Clay mario. They may only call them mario bros. because mario is more recognised, and usally the main one. Starry Parakarry (talk)- Per Clay Mario. Keep the last names from the movie Tucayo (talk) Well, actually the last names are Mario, because when they say Mario Bros., they are saying that they are the Mario brothers, that makes them Mario Mario and Luigi Mario. Toadette 4evur (talk) Per Tucayo. MegaMario9910 (talk) Per Tucayo. All the info has to come from something Mario related, and which the movie is related. Booster -- Their last name isn't from the truest canon, but they are the Mario Bros. TSMBSS also used Mario as their last name. Also, nothing seems to dispove this theory, aside from the fact that their last name is never mentioned in any game. Cobold (talk) - content from the movie is alternate canon, and we already have rules how to deal with it. When the last name is mentioned somewhere, there should be a note that it is indeed from the movie and not from the games. It also should only appear in the initial section and in the movie section, perhaps in the personal description section, but not anywhere else. Pikax (talk)Per Tucayo - that Mario bros. point is impossible to object to. InfectedShroom (talk) - per all. As a very small side note, Nintendo Power also said the last names are "Mario." MelissaMarioSister (talk) - per all. And InfectedShroom is right; Nintendo Power did say their surname was "Mario." Although... I just found a video from 1988 where Inside Edition does a segment on SMB, and they interviewed NOA's head of advertising at the time. He said Mario and Luigi didn't have a last name. I found the video at DevilDucky.com. Still, it could have been retconned since then. Ultimatetoad (see comment below) Stumpers (talk) - The movie is as "official" as any game. That means, regardless of it being canon or not to the games, it still has a place on this Wiki. That includes names. However, I would support a proposal that would make separate articles for the movie incarnations of the characters, because they are so different and deserve individual personality and history sections. But this proposal? No way. The Wiki should preserve all of Mario's history, not just video games. MC Hammer Bro. Per Stumpers (and see comment below) DragonFeather (talk) Per Tucayo. Ninjayoshi - Per all. Also, InfectedShroom is right. Shroobario (talk) It's the Mario Bros. what makes Mario be Mario Mario and Luigi be Luigi Mario, They didn't invent that in the movie. Paper Jorge (talk) Per all, mostly Stumpers. The Mario Movie may not have been canon but it exists so we have to mention that it at least exists. Make a seperate Section/Article for Non-game info Garlic Man (talk) - Per comments below. Comments Uh... KP, you can't do that. MegaMario9910 (talk) Double votes I'm sure is against MarioWiki Policy. Clay Mario (talk) Plus you probably used ~~~~, which can't be used. MegaMario9910 (talk) actually, I use ~~~ because I don't have time to make a sig subpage. So, I just use the user template. Clay Mario (talk) ~~~ is fine when you don't have a personalized sig in it. - Cobold (talk) I didn't notice, but I put you... sorry... I mean KP. He used his sig. MegaMario9910 (talk) I think that even if if was in the tsmbss it still may not be true. because the show was not made directly by nintendo. Dryest_bowser (talk) All Sports games except for Mario Kart, all Mario RPGs and Mario Party, all Donkey Kong games before Jungle Beat, and the Yoshi games were also not directly made by Nintendo. Not to mention the crossover titles. That's not really an argument. - Cobold (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT) Well, is there any proof from the games that the last name is Mario? If there isn't, I'd support. Sure, they are the Mario Bros., but maybe they're just called that since Mario's the leader. If we put "Mario" for Mario's name in the infobox, it's not saying his last name definitely isn't Mario, it's just saying that his first name is all we're sure of. And that seems true now, with this controversy. The question is, why would parents name their kid Mario Mario? Well, things in Mario don't have to make sense, actually. CrystalYoshi (talk) I guess there is slight evidence because, in Dr. Mario, his name is Dr. Mario. Usually the last name would follow the title. But then again, things in mario don't have to make sense, it could be his first name. Clay Mario (talk) The Dr. title preceds both the given name and the family name, so it can be both. - Cobold (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2008 (EDT) However,in Dr. Mario, Princess Peach goes by her last name (family name) (nurse Toadstool and not "nurse Peach"). MC Hammer Bro. (talk) Even Mario calls her "Toadstool" sometimes, and you wouldn't expect him to call her by her last name, so that argument doesn't really count. Time Q (talk) 08:30, 8 June 2008 (EDT) Cobold has a point, sometimes Mario games are made by third-party developers. But when its made by third-party developers, usually, there are no significant changes. For example, Mario Superstar Basbeball, developed by Namco doesn't feature new enemies or characters. Clay Mario (talk) Almost. These are what you call second-party developers. They create games (/TV shows) using Nintendo's property. What would be the use of the term "third party" if there wasn't a second? - Cobold (talk) In the SMA comic, Bowser calls Mario & Luigi "The Mario's" keep-em. - Ultimatetoad Well if you look at many websites and other media (mario fan based or not) the last name of "Mario" has been used. Plus why would nintendo call the game " Mario Bros. " if Luigi had just been introduced (without knowing wheather or not he'd be the "side kick" and or "the new leader")? One more question: what is the way the Japanease would call to brothers in this manner? Would they use the older brother's first name? Beats me. Ok I'm done!- MC Hammer Bro. Considering Mario Party team names such as "Green Bros." for Luigi & Yoshi, I think that "Mario Bros." actually isn't meant to say that Mario is their last name, but Mario is the main guy. See "Baby Mario Bros." etc. - Cobold (talk) 17:08, 7 June 2008 (EDT) I'd like to challenge this proposal's validity to a certain extent, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. It was my impression that proposals were here so that we could discuss the way information is presented (merges, splits, features, placing spin-off information in separate sections, etc.), right? Another area we could vote on is how in depth to go. (include Banjo articles, include cries and other noises in the quote section, Snufit Ball, etc.) Originally I just assumed that this proposal was one of the latter, but what I'm thinking now is that this proposal really isn't fair. It would be fair to vote for movie information to be separated from main character pages (after all, the storyline is different, personalities are different, backstories, even species... the list goes on.) say onto a different page like "Mario Mario (film character)" or something. However, this article is saying that we would be allowed to mention all movie information in a character's article except for their full names according to the movie. Not only would this confuse readers and new editors, it's a little flawed. We shouldn't be selectively chosing what points of information are included and are not. Either all official video games should be here or they shouldn't be. Either the movie should be here or it shouldn't be. Not mentioning "Mario Mario" as a full name would only be acceptable if the movie was not covered by this Wiki. Otherwise it's confusing. We'd need to change our policy to say, "We cover the Mario video games, comics, and TV shows completly. We also cover the movie, except for Mario and Luigi's names in the film." To wrap this up: we can limit the number and type of pictures or quotes we post. We can chose not to cover the strategy of each level. All this is because of our job as a Wiki: to create an easy-access method for Mario fans to immerse themselves into the complete series. However, failing to mention a key fact, such as Mario's full name in the movie, is big. What if we didn't mention the history behind Princess Peach's name change? How about the change in Yoshi's voice? It's about time that we on this Wiki acknowledged a key fact: There is canon and there is nonfictional history. Who completely different things that the Wiki must cover, lest we be forced to call ourselves a "guide to what, as established throuh proposals, our userse feel is canon to the Mario storyline" instead of a "Complete guide to the complete Mario series". Which would you rather read? Stumpers (talk) 03:15, 8 June 2008 (EDT) Well then, why not have a section about the two possibilities? Even though we cover the movie, that doesn't mean we consider the movie to be part of the continuity. CrystalYoshi (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2008 (EDT) I haven't voted yet, because this proposal needs another section; I agree with Crystal Yoshi here. I think the article should have a sepreate section, with everything non-gamical in there; comics, cartoons, Movie, etc. But the main infobox at the top of the article should stay Mario. The diferrent non-game section could perhaps have Mario Mario. Or, as suggested somewhere else, we could make a seperate article. Template:Fakelink or something, I guess. EDIT: A new section following CrystalYoshi's comment has been created.Garlic Man (talk) I strongly disagree with making a new section for every different incarnation of Mario. They're doing that right now on Wikipedia with Sonic the Hedgehog characters, and it's an extremly stupid process. They are the SAME person. - Ultimatetoad Miscellaneous None at the moment.