Talk:Frog

Split Frog (Donkey Kong), Frog (Yoshi's Story), and Frog (Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon)

Template:SettledTPP Template:ProposalOutcome For some reason, this page is essentially just a list of frogs in the Mario series. Because of this, the frogs that assist you in Donkey Kong and the frog enemies from Yoshi's Story and Luigi's Mansion are on this page, even though they have nothing to do with each other or generic real-world frogs, any more than they have to do with Frog Pirates or Kleptoads. Sure, they don't have unique names, but neither do Bees and we have those split.

Proposer: Niiue (talk)
Deadline: February 14, 2016, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Niiue (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose

1. Walkazo (talk) - This is getting too excessive for my tastes. Plenty of enemies with specific names have different roles in different games, yet we don't split them most of the time: why do the same here just because they're generic species? If anything, that'll just undermine the plain "Frog" page to the point where it no longer is worth covering per MarioWiki:Generic subjects and then we've lost a perfectly fine article and all the tidbits about the truly misc frogs. The unnamed frog info can be understood perfectly well all grouped together: splitting is unnecessary complication.
2. Bazooka Mario (talk) Nope, this split goes against the spirit of MarioWiki:Generic subjects. What do you mean by "they have nothing to do with each other or generic real-world frogs" because they seem like they act any old generic frog, especially the ones you suggest to split in the first place.
3. Baby Luigi (talk) Per all
4. LudwigVon (talk) Per all.
5. Wildgoosespeeder (talk) Per all.

Comments

@Walkazo: If the article is only useful as a catch-all list of every frog in the Mario series, regardless of behavior and in-game role, then maybe it's just not a very good article.

@Bazooka Mario: How do the frogs I mentioned act like "any old generic frog"? The Donkey Kong ones are allies that can move you to higher platforms, and the Yoshi's Story and Luigi's Mansion ones are enemies with unique behaviors. They have as much do to with regular frogs as Chickens have to do with regular chickens. Literally the only thing they have to do with each other is that they're frogs, and they would definitely have separate pages if they were actually given unique names. Niiue (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2016 (EST)

To me, they seem like jumping platforms, and frogs are known for jumping, so it's not unusual behavior for a frog at all. Yoshi's Story one doesn't have a lot of detail, but they're enemies that appear in lagoons and hurt Yoshi... exactly how does that make them different from normal frogs? Finally, Luigi's Mansion frogs, the only property that's totally different is in the final King Boo battle, but the normal ambiance enemies seem to act like normal frogs to me. Chicken (enemy) doesn't even barely resemble a chicken compared to the frogs Yoshi's Story or the Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon resembling frogs so I don't know why you brought that up. And yes, names are important. Yes, if they had their own names, they'd get their own page, but they don't, so they're generic enemies and belong to an umbrella page for these generic enemies. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 20:45, 31 January 2016 (EST)

Split Frog and cut down on its genericness, take 2

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Saturday, November 23, 2024, 15:46 GMT

Yes, I see the proposal directly above this one, but both the proposal and the opposition itself was flawed compared to what I'm about to propose. Essentially, what I'm proposing is that we split part or all of the Frog article by game, as we actually already do the same for Beetle and Mole. Let me break it down for you:

• Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars: These frogs are clearly sapient, and don't behave as the other non-generic frogs do. You can also actually interact with them.
• Diddy Kong Racing: These frogs serve little purpose other than one that turns out to be a cursed Drumstick, so I think we should just delete this section as being too generic, but that's for another proposal.
• Yoshi's Story: These frogs are actual enemies that attack the targeted Yoshi.
• Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon: Unlike Yoshi's Story's frogs, these frogs are red and yellow in color, and can be defeated with the Strobulb.
• Super Mario Odyssey: The most generic of the many types of frogs, these ones are more well known for their capture abilities than anything else (they're neither characters you can interact with nor are they truly enemies).

Unlike the Banana case, I don't see how these splits would be too complicated nor open up a can of worms. Each of the four non-generic Frog appearances look noticeably different from each other, and I think a split is warranted here.

EDIT: I've made the proposal multi-option to counter the current opposition.

Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: January 1, 2019, 23:59 GMT

Split everything

1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per my proposal.
2. Waluigi Time (talk) Per proposal, I was actually thinking of proposing this myself a while back but never got around to it.
3. FanOfYoshi (talk) Indubitably. We don't cover generic subjects, and the Yoshi's Story Frogs may be split. In a talk page, are we allowed to several proposals at once, or only one proposal at once? Anyways, i support removing it genericness.
4. Ghost Jam (talk) Per absurdity. Without even looking at the topic at hand, this proposal is out of control. Cut that shit down to two or three options, take it to the forum discussion boards if you're having trouble with that. 1 vote to administrative close.

Just split Frog (Yoshi's Story)

1. 7feetunder (talk) We should at least do this; these should not be lumped in with generic frogs simply because the Nintendo Power writers didn't bother to give them a non-generic name.

Don't split anything

1. Bazooka Mario (talk) Disagree. I think it's overkill to have multiple articles on what's essentially a generic subject. This article works fine as a catch-all on all the frogs on the series, and I am also opposed to removing information on Diddy Kong Racing because it's part of an unlock requirement and also an interactable (albeit minor) gameplay element. Do not dissect the frog.
2. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) I'd support splitting off the Yoshi's Story ones due to having a specialized Japanese name, but the rest of these have every right to be on here. Additionally, given the first game we cover to feature generic frogs is SMW2, to say it's anything else would be straight-up lying.
3. Doomhiker (talk) Per all, especially Bazooka Mario, making different articles for every single non-generic appearance of frog would be overkill, just as it would be if we spit articles for every single appearance of a single thing, such as if we split Biddybud into Biddybud (Super Mario 3D Land) and Biddybud (Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam) and more separate articles for every single appearance of the Biddybud.
4. Alex95 (talk) - I don't think anything needs to be done, it looks like the coverage is non-generic enough to me.
5. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per Bazooka Mario.

Comments

How do you feel about the fact that the DKR ones sing with human voices? They can also be interacted with, if only marginally. I'd support splitting the YS ones due to having a non-generic Japanese names, but I'm on the fence for the others. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2018 (EST)

@FanOfYoshi: As far as I know, there's no limit on how many TPPs can be related to a certain article at once, but it can't interfere with a proposal that's currently running. -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 11:56, 19 December 2018 (EST)

Shouldn't the "Support" and "Oppose" be named after something that has to do with the frog? Like respectively "Dissect generic Frogs" and "Let them live in their lake and bounce whenever they want"? -- FanOfYoshi 12:48, 19 December 2018 (EST)

No. Silliness is not required. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2018 (EST)

FanOfYoshi: We do cover generic subjects... We have MarioWiki:Generic subjects that deal specifically with covering them. On the other note, yes, we do allow several proposals. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:28, 19 December 2018 (EST)

Is this proposal splitting Yoshi's Story Frogs? Or only the other Frogs? These appear to be the "Frog Pirates" of Yoshi's Story. And have a different Japanese name. "Geko" instead of "Kaeru". The Yoshi's Story ones will have Frog (Yoshi's Story) as an article name. -- FanOfYoshi 02:05, 20 December 2018 (EST)

@Bazooka Mario, the exception is that if they don't have any generic relation with the generic subject. -- FanOfYoshi 02:48, 20 December 2018 (EST)

I asked if this proposal splitted off Frog (Yoshi's Story), or only some frogs, before i make a proposal about it. -- FanOfYoshi 13:02, 20 December 2018 (EST)

Please stop responding to yourself. Just wait for them to respond in their own time, don't be impatient. @_@ Anyways, due to this proposal, you can't make one on the subject right now. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:05, 20 December 2018 (EST)

Anyways, let me break this down a little: Beetle and Mole's examples were all pretty specialized (note how one example of beetles were a design parody of the Beatles, and one mole was part-plant). With this, only one isn't generic, and that's only due to Japanese name, and all of them can be interacted with, giving them a gameplay purpose, which is what allows generic subjects. Ergo, every section aside from possibly the SMRPG section (as these are specific characters) and the Story section with the specified name deserves to be simply on the frog page. The former could be removed for said reason, and the latter split. But everything else should stay until further notice. Other splitting with this kinda falls outside guidelines, I do believe, as they're still generic subjects that, according to said guidelines, are indeed allowed a page due to having a gameplay purpose. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2018 (EST)

@Doomhiker: Biddybud is a different case entirely. This is talking about four clearly generic frogs that might be worth considering for a split. ^(T|C) 19:12, 20 December 2018 (EST)

True, Biddybud is a different case, my point was that it, in my opinion it would be going overboard to make a page for each different frog appearance in a game, as they share the same names and generic subjects are generally are herded into one large article, such as with Hot Dog. The reason that I mentioned Biddybuds is that if Frogs warrant separate articles per each game appearance then it would make sense to do the same with non-generic things to, which in my opinion would be overkill unless they had separate names, and thus clearly are meant to be different species, such as with Goombo. It is true that other generic subjects like Beetle have separate pages per game, so perhaps a proposal for what should and should not be split into an article per game appearance could be made. As for now, I do think that the frog page and other generic subjects should stay merged. Sorry for my poor wording! Doomhiker (talk) 19:59, 20 December 2018 (EST)

I forgot to mention, I do think that generic subjects that have been turned into characters such as with Beetle (Donkey Kong 64) should be split, however none of the frogs are characters except for Drumstick, however Drumstick is simply a cursed frog, and as it is covered in the Drumstick page it would be unnecessary to give the cursed drumstick its own page. Doomhiker (talk) 20:07, 20 December 2018 (EST)

I'm actually going to make this a multi option proposal soon, seeing as how I clearly rushed out this proposal. ^(T|C) 20:10, 20 December 2018 (EST)

Gosh, that's a LOT of options, but hopefully everyone can work out the change all right. ^(T|C) 20:15, 20 December 2018 (EST)