Talk:Mario Bros.-e

Merge

As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with Mario Bros.. We also merged the Classic NES Series with the respective original games. --Grandy02 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't Merge it with the NES version. Dark Lakitu 789

this article is a stub so it should be merged into it KS3 (talk · contribute)

Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

This game is the same as the NES version, though, just on a different platform. There is no reason for a separate article. --Grandy02 09:36, 18 February 2010 (EST)

it should merge because it is considered as a remake of the game
The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperGamerX17 (talk).

I wouldn't even consider it a remake. It is just an emulation of the NES game. --Grandy02 12:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree to merge it. It is the EXACT SAME as the NES version, only on a GameBoy Advance E-Reader. Indeed, there is no reason for the E-Reader version to have it's own article. --Killer Axe

Merge

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

merge 11-0
As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and not a remake. I propose that we should merge them.

Proposer:Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk)
Deadline: 23:59, 27 November 2010 GMT

Merge

1. Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk) Per Proposal.
2. Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out.
3. MarioManiac (talk) Per proposal.
4. Garlic Stapler (talk) Per proposal
5. JF (talk) Per all.
6. Bowser's luma (talk) Per all.
7. M&SG (talk) - Article should be merged. Emulated games don't require separate articles.
8. SWFlash (talk) No differences
9. Edofenrir (talk) - Per M&SG.
10. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per all.
11. Mario Fan 123 (talk) - Per Luigi and per all.

Comments

Remember this is an emulation. Its an exact port from the NES version. I can see why SMAS+SMW was split, but I can't see why this was split if its the same game on a different port.--Its-a-meYoshi!

We have an Article for Mario Party-e so we should keep this one. GalladeBlades

@ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for Mario Party-e because it is its own game. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-Its-a-meYoshi!

I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games. Garlic Stapler (talk)

I think it doesn't need a specific article, because the Super Mario Advance games were packed into the same articles as the originals and this one practically is in the same state as the SMA games and so there shouldn't be an extra article for this one! -Freakworld