MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Fawfulfury65) |
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 16:37, December 12, 2010
Honeyhive Galaxy
Remove Featured Article Status
Keep Featured Article Status
- Bowser's luma (talk) Since Tucayo fixed the tense and such, it's now fine. Merci boucoup Tucayo (and I leave you speaking French to a Mexican...)
- Tucayo (talk) - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I'll fix the demonstratives thing. Tucayo (talk)
It seems as if the verb tense template was changed to a different rewrite template, but still, that's against the rules. Bowser's luma (talk)
All problems have been solved. It was written terribly Tucayo (talk)
