MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Baby Peach

Baby Peach

Keep Featured Article Status

1. MeritC (talk) I seriously don't see why this needs to be unfeatured. We don't have any more info to put on this page, and how the "History" has been laid out in regards to Baby Peach's "chronology" is in good order. Hence my vote to keep the "featured article" here.
2. Birdo beauties (talk) Per MeritC.
3. Commander Code-8 (talk) Umm... What's wrong with this article?? The start needs some expansion but it's not something that will Unfeature the article.
4. KS3 (talk) Per all.
5. Booderdash (talk) Very small detail equals very easy feature.

Comments

Wait, hold up a second -- since when was it the standard that the "History" section should be in "game appearance" order. If I'm not mistaken, I'm under the assumption that this is the proposer's complaint. He's saying that regardless of "chronological order", game appearance order overrides that. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 04:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

MeritC: You are completely correct. Which makes the vote invalid, which means that someone has to remove it. That's why I added the removal section. But we need one more vote and the admin vote. Marioguy1 (talk)