Talk:Dark Spin: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::I dunno, but its similar to his shockwave attack from SM64 and SM64DS so if it should be merged, it should be merged with that atack because it's basically the same attack with a twist on it.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | ::::I dunno, but its similar to his shockwave attack from SM64 and SM64DS so if it should be merged, it should be merged with that atack because it's basically the same attack with a twist on it.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | ||
:::::I never got to Bowser since I got bored of it, so I don't know that attack. Feel free to create a merge proposal if you want. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | :::::I never got to Bowser since I got bored of it, so I don't know that attack. Feel free to create a merge proposal if you want. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
::::::I have a Prima guide, and it just stated Bowser's attacks, the author didn't "name" them. And I don't even think this article is relevant anyway (I agree with Knife's comment below this one). {{user:Mario jc/sig}} | |||
Unofficially named attacks don't get articles because theoretically, someone could create an article on anything.--{{User|Knife}} 13:43, 25 December 2009 (EST) | Unofficially named attacks don't get articles because theoretically, someone could create an article on anything.--{{User|Knife}} 13:43, 25 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:So literally, should we delete the article? {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | :So literally, should we delete the article? {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
:: Is it a bad idea to merge this with the [[Spin]]? {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 21:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | :: Is it a bad idea to merge this with the [[Spin]]? {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 21:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:18, August 13, 2010
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Is this officially named? If so, it should be capitalized as "Dark Spin", right? Time Questions 13:24, 19 December 2009 (EST)
- Somebody grab a Prima guide to verify. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- It probably won't state it...--FREAK ~Game
Freak~ OUT!
- It's worth a try. As of now though, let's just label it as made up. Actually, since it's an attack by Bowser, shouldn't it be merged into Bowser's article? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I dunno, but its similar to his shockwave attack from SM64 and SM64DS so if it should be merged, it should be merged with that atack because it's basically the same attack with a twist on it.--FREAK ~Game Freak~ OUT!
- I never got to Bowser since I got bored of it, so I don't know that attack. Feel free to create a merge proposal if you want. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I dunno, but its similar to his shockwave attack from SM64 and SM64DS so if it should be merged, it should be merged with that atack because it's basically the same attack with a twist on it.--FREAK ~Game
- It's worth a try. As of now though, let's just label it as made up. Actually, since it's an attack by Bowser, shouldn't it be merged into Bowser's article? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- It probably won't state it...--FREAK ~Game
Unofficially named attacks don't get articles because theoretically, someone could create an article on anything.--Knife (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2009 (EST)
- So literally, should we delete the article? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
