Talk:Roc: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Merge all the Rocs into Roc==
==Merge all the Rocs into Roc==
{{TPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">Failed 1-7</span>
 
I propose that we merge all the Rocs into the Roc article, because most of them are stubs and all are just a generic version of each other and mergeing all of them won't be a bad idea.
I propose that we merge all the Rocs into the Roc article, because most of them are stubs and all are just a generic version of each other and mergeing all of them won't be a bad idea.


{{scroll box|content=
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Zero777}}<br>
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Zero777}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' 31 July, 2010, 24:00
'''Deadline:''' 31 July, 2010, 24:00
Line 19: Line 22:


====Comment====
====Comment====
}}

Revision as of 07:54, August 1, 2010

Merge all the Rocs into Roc

Template:SettledTPP Failed 1-7

I propose that we merge all the Rocs into the Roc article, because most of them are stubs and all are just a generic version of each other and mergeing all of them won't be a bad idea.

Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Deadline: 31 July, 2010, 24:00

Support

  1. Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per proposal. Zero signing out.

Oppose

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Not until all the Kongs, the Hogs, and the Tusks are merged.
  2. Arend (talk) Currently, this article is about species. If we'd merge all the Rocs to this, we must change it to a group of bosses with "Roc" as surname, before everyone thinks Scruff Rocs and Hard Rocs are species, while they're just one character. But it's unknown that they formed an alliance or group, and they're never seen together at once. Also, per LGM.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all
  4. Commander Code-8 (talk) Per all.
  5. Ratfink43 (talk) Per LGM. I would support this if all the Kongs, Hogs, and Tusks are merged
  6. Booderdash (talk) Different things.
  7. Dry dry king (talk) That would be... er... well, just per LGM and Arend.

Comment