Talk:Confused: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Oppose: Oh noes) |
Booderdash (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#{{User|Arend}} There are [[:Category:Status effects|way too much status effects]], and only a few of them are positive. | #{{User|Arend}} There are [[:Category:Status effects|way too much status effects]], and only a few of them are positive. | ||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all. | #{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all. | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} Ridiculous, there are way too many status ailments, and most of them are significient enonugh, to have their own page. | |||
====Comment==== | ====Comment==== |
Revision as of 17:58, July 28, 2010
Merge All Status Ailments
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Thursday, November 14, 2024, 10:45 GMT
I say we merge all the status ailments because most of them are stubs, most only appear in one or two games, and there is not much to talk about each individual ailment so mergeing them won't be a bad idea, but there are two ideas to name this new article where all the ailments will be merged, it is either "List of Status Ailments" or just simply "Status Ailments".
Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Deadline: 3 August, 2010, 24:00
List of Status Ailments
Status Ailments
Oppose
- Arend (talk) There are way too much status effects, and only a few of them are positive.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per all.
- Booderdash (talk) Ridiculous, there are way too many status ailments, and most of them are significient enonugh, to have their own page.
Comment
Wait, in what game are we merging the Status Ailments? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)