MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Wii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Per everyone's statements in the section above. | #{{User|KS3}} Per everyone's statements in the section above. | ||
#{{User|4DJONG}} Well, there are articles about the games, and we don't want to turn the page into a list of games. | #{{User|4DJONG}} Well, there are articles about the games, and we don't want to turn the page into a list of games. | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - We don't need a paragraph on every single game, the game's own articles do that. And it would not be like just writing a list of enemies on a game article and calling it a day. It would be more like writing a list of enemies and, oh so help me lord, not writing a paragraph describing each. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 19:10, July 7, 2010
Wii
Remove Featured Article Status
- Reversinator (talk) First off, I have to say it's acutally a good article. But it lacks one major thing: it lacks a description of its games. That'd be like just listing enemies for a game and not explaining anything about them. Speaking of expansion, where did the description for the Virtual Console go?
Keep Featured Article Status
- Gamefreak75 (talk) We have separate pages for the games so the article won't get cluttered up. What do you mean to describe them anyway?
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I think a summary of all the games is nice, but it is not required in this article. Like what 65 said in the comments, this is an article about the Wii, not the games.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) Per the guys above me.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Uh, the description for the Virtual Console is here. And for the rest of your complaints, the guys above me nailed it.
- KS3 (talk) Per all.
- Byllant (talk) - I see no problem with this article, keep FA stats.
- Larryman (talk) - I do not see a problem with the article
- Kirbythestar (talk) Per all.
- FireBabyLuigi11 (talk) Good article....me likey!
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Revesinator
- KS3 (talk) Per everyone's statements in the section above.
- 4DJONG (talk) Well, there are articles about the games, and we don't want to turn the page into a list of games.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - We don't need a paragraph on every single game, the game's own articles do that. And it would not be like just writing a list of enemies on a game article and calling it a day. It would be more like writing a list of enemies and, oh so help me lord, not writing a paragraph describing each.
Comments
GameFreak: Well, I think he meant to describe them like in the "series" articles. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- That's exactly what I mean. Reversinator (talk)
- In my opinion, it seems rather unnecessary. Gamefreak75 (talk)
- Alright, I'll use the Koopalings as an example. It describes each of the Koopalings, but does it need to? According to you, no. Reversinator (talk)
- The article on the Koopalings describes all the Koopalings because well... the article is about all the Koopalings. This article is about the Wii, not its games. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- Alright, I'll use the Koopalings as an example. It describes each of the Koopalings, but does it need to? According to you, no. Reversinator (talk)
- In my opinion, it seems rather unnecessary. Gamefreak75 (talk)
Referring to KS3's comment in Removal of Support/Oppose Votes: If Reversinator started the unfeature thing, his comment should stay there, I think. Mario jc (talk)
- Well, that's how unfeature nominations get defeated, as in the Princess Daisy unfeature nomination. KS3 (talk)
- It' now 9 to 1. I think it should be ununfeatured(featured) now. FireBabyLuigi11 (talk)
