Talk:List of implied species: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Pokémon - Needed?)
Line 17: Line 17:
{{talk}}
{{talk}}
Seriously, why do we need virtually meaningless information on dozens of ìmplied Pokémon at Super ''Mario'' Wiki? No offense, but this is like adding every character and anything briefly mentioned in a trophy description of something that is of no relevance for the wiki, other than that it is found in ''Smash Bros.'' --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 12:45, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
Seriously, why do we need virtually meaningless information on dozens of ìmplied Pokémon at Super ''Mario'' Wiki? No offense, but this is like adding every character and anything briefly mentioned in a trophy description of something that is of no relevance for the wiki, other than that it is found in ''Smash Bros.'' --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 12:45, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
:Yeah, why do we?--[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] 12:50, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:50, May 17, 2010

Pokemon

Would it be worth putting implied Pokemon in this list? I'm talking about guys like Charmeleon and Wartortle, who are mentioned in trophy descriptions of Pokemon that exist in the Smash Bros. series. -- Booster

That information should be on the Wiki, like you said. Either be here or on the Pokemon page would probably work. Depending on the amount of information we're talking about, a single section on this page would probably work. Otherwise, what we could do is have an "Implied Pokemon" section on this page and link to the future section in the Pokemon article about implied Pokemon. Does that sound good? Stumpers! 21:13, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Sounds good. I suppose it should go on this page, since they're still only implied, but under a seperate heading or something. Maybe put a link near the bottom of the main Pokemon page or something. -- Booster (talk)

It's really a matter of personal opinion, and since you're taking on the task, I think you should be the one to make the call. Stumpers! 23:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)

I'll just go ahead and use this page. Thanks for your imput! -- Booster (talk)

I didn't realize how many implied Pokemon there were! Maybe this page isn't the place for them. -- Booster (talk)
Yeah, there are quite a few! Stumpers! 16:05, 29 January 2009 (EST)

Burpin' Beetle

Really? I mean, come on, I really doubt that Nintendo wanted to apply it as a species and it's just a bettle that burped. Just because it burps, it makes it a new species? It's like if a Shy Guy danced, he'd create the "Dancing Shy Guy" species. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Mmhgrm: Dancing Spear Guy... Yeah, I agree with you. I would have removed it myself, but I haven't played TTYD so I wasn't sure if it was stated as "Burpin' Beetle" or "Are there burpin' Beetles around?" Remove if necessary. Redstar 18:14, 17 December 2009 (EST)
He says: "Just a little burpin' beetle". No capital on "burpin'" so I'll go delete it. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Pokémon - Needed?

Block Super Mario World.png This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Seriously, why do we need virtually meaningless information on dozens of ìmplied Pokémon at Super Mario Wiki? No offense, but this is like adding every character and anything briefly mentioned in a trophy description of something that is of no relevance for the wiki, other than that it is found in Smash Bros. --Grandy02 12:45, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Yeah, why do we?--Starman125 12:50, 17 May 2010 (EDT)