MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party 6: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|KS3}} A very good article, with no mistakes, plenty of pictures, and what an FA should look like. | #{{User|KS3}} A very good article, with no mistakes, plenty of pictures, and what an FA should look like. | ||
#{{User|VCS777}} What he said. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 18:05, March 28, 2010
Mario Party 6
Support
- KS3 (talk) A very good article, with no mistakes, plenty of pictures, and what an FA should look like.
- VCS777 (talk) What he said.
Oppose
- Reversinator (talk) Let's see... Extremely small introduction, copied story, some bad grammar, missing punctuation, and short sections.
- Tucayo (talk) - Copied story, trivia section overly long and at the same time puns section is incomplete.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Board section needs expansion and per all. Unofortunately, I don't have the game, so I can't help this one out.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though the table was the work of me, I still don't think it's fine YET to get featured. Per all.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) per all.
- Commander Code-8 (talk)We surely can't have a featured article that start's off with one sentance and gives us no information!
