MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Byllant}} - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them. | #{{User|Byllant}} - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them. | ||
#{{User|The Mario's Master}} I agree with {{User|Byllant}}. This article gave me a lot of info. It should be a featured article. So, it's 3-2. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 10:50, March 19, 2010
Super Mario Bros.
Support
- Byllant (talk) - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them.
- The Mario's Master (talk) I agree with Byllant (talk). This article gave me a lot of info. It should be a featured article. So, it's 3-2.
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) If it still needs references, it doesn't get featured until we do. The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite. Plus, the trivia section is quite long.
- Commander Code-8 (talk)The story section looks as though it was written by a child. So No
- Reversinator (talk) The Developement section has been plagiarized from Nintendopedia.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
In your summary: "The long-awaited Developement section is here, partially edited from the Nintendopedia"
Tell me you hadn't plagiarized it -_-; BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- I said partially, obviously I didn't just copy and paste, that would been inapropiate. Byllant (talk)
- So in other words, you copy and pasted it, and then changed it? Reversinator (talk)
@BLOF: What do you mean when you say "The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite."? --Marcelagus (talk)
- (I must recuse myself from supporting/opposing again, having edited both the talkpage and the article.)
- BLOF: Someone drew the boxart; someone drew Mario, in all his fiery glory; someone drew the font on the box; someone drew the "Action Series" logo; someone drew the Nintendo logo. It's art. Sprites are a type of art. That is a nonissue.
- Copying and pasting, then changing a few words is still plagarism. Someone else wrote it in the first place, and even if you replace (as an example) "kill" with "stomp" it's still someone else's work. You haven't changed the underlying meaning, the sentence structure -- nothing. The only way to add new material is to write it yourself. Toadfan (talk)
