MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:I said partially, obviously I didn't just copy and paste, that would been inapropiate. {{User|Byllant}} | :I said partially, obviously I didn't just copy and paste, that would been inapropiate. {{User|Byllant}} | ||
::So in other words, you copy and pasted it, and then changed it? {{User|Reversinator}} | |||
@BLOF: What do you mean when you say ''"The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite."''? --{{User|Marcelagus}} | @BLOF: What do you mean when you say ''"The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite."''? --{{User|Marcelagus}} | ||
Revision as of 07:36, March 11, 2010
Super Mario Bros.
Support
- Byllant (talk) - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them.
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) If it still needs references, it doesn't get featured until we do. The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite. Plus, the trivia section is quite long.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
In your summary: "The long-awaited Developement section is here, partially edited from the Nintendopedia"
Tell me you hadn't plagiarized it -_-; BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- I said partially, obviously I didn't just copy and paste, that would been inapropiate. Byllant (talk)
- So in other words, you copy and pasted it, and then changed it? Reversinator (talk)
@BLOF: What do you mean when you say "The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite."? --Marcelagus (talk)
