Talk:Tanooki Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
#{{User|Redstar}} - If we merged this, we'd have to follow suit and do the same with all the other power-ups and their corresponding forms. The current standard is fine. If you feel otherwise, I would recommend taking this proposal to the [[MarioWiki:Proposals]] page, is it affects far too many articles. | #{{User|Redstar}} - If we merged this, we'd have to follow suit and do the same with all the other power-ups and their corresponding forms. The current standard is fine. If you feel otherwise, I would recommend taking this proposal to the [[MarioWiki:Proposals]] page, is it affects far too many articles. | ||
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Like what the users said about the other abilities, ones a form, ones a character. We have Metal Mario split into character and form, and they are working better than before. They don't need to be merged!!! | #{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Like what the users said about the other abilities, ones a form, ones a character. We have Metal Mario split into character and form, and they are working better than before. They don't need to be merged!!! | ||
#{{User|Time Q}}: Per all. | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Revision as of 11:19, January 29, 2010
Shouldn't this be merged with Tanooki Suit since it has the same topic?F g
- Well, Tanooki Suit is to Tanooki Mario like Cape Feather is to Cape Mario, right? I don't think it should be merged. Time Questions 06:41, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
- For each Mario form there are two articles, one for the transformation and one for the power-up used. As Time Q said, it shouldn't be merged. --Xeze 11:19, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
Yep, is the same thing and I think make a redirection from Tanooki Mario to Tanooki Suit.
D e i J i ~ Is a Mario addict
- But for almost every transformation, there is also an article on the power-up if there is one. --Grandy02 15:26, 20 November 2008 (EST)
They should be merged emmidiately!! User:ppi80/sig
- Why so? I don't think so. Time Questions 16:33, 6 March 2009 (EST)
- Per Time Q. - Paperphailurethemariomonster99
- Agree, it shouldn't be merged. One article is for the power-up, the other one for the transformation. The same goes for Super Leaf/Raccoon Mario, Wing Cap/Wing Mario, Boo Mushroom/Boo Mario and so on. Hasn't that been made clear already? Why are those merging templates there again? --Grandy02 14:50, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
Merge Tanooki Mario to Tanooki Suit
I read them and they say pretty much the same thing so I propose we merge them together.
Proposer: I will help the mariowiki a lot (talk)
Deadline: 11 February 2010
Merge them
- I will help the mariowiki a lot (talk) Per proposal.
Don't Merge them
- Reversinator (talk) No. One's an item, another's a form. That's enough reason to keep them separate.
- Redstar (talk) - If we merged this, we'd have to follow suit and do the same with all the other power-ups and their corresponding forms. The current standard is fine. If you feel otherwise, I would recommend taking this proposal to the MarioWiki:Proposals page, is it affects far too many articles.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) Like what the users said about the other abilities, ones a form, ones a character. We have Metal Mario split into character and form, and they are working better than before. They don't need to be merged!!!
- Time Q (talk): Per all.
