Talk:Big Ninji: Difference between revisions
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
MarioKart66! (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} We have a giant everything else, so let's be consistent. | #{{User|Reversinator}} We have a giant everything else, so let's be consistent. | ||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Both are considered two different species, therefore they both get different articles. And like Reversinator said, we have giant everything else, even [[Mario]] and [[Mega Mario]]. | #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Both are considered two different species, therefore they both get different articles. And like Reversinator said, we have giant everything else, even [[Mario]] and [[Mega Mario]]. | ||
#{{User|MarioKart66!}} Per Reversinator. | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Revision as of 22:46, January 15, 2010
Merge into Ninji or make Template:Fakelink article
(Wasn't sure which talk page to put this on, I'm sorry if someone thinks this is in the wrong place)
I have noticed that while the giant Ninji has a seperate article, the giant Shy Guy variety from Super Mario Advance is only mentioned in the Shy Guy article. Since a giant Ninji is no more different from a Ninji than a giant Shy Guy is from a Shy Guy, I propose to either merge this into Ninji or make a seperate article for the giant Shy Guy to achieve some uniformness.
(NOTE: The "Giant Shy Guy" title is just an example, based on this article's title; I don't know if "Giant ..." is the official name, or if there is an official name, but if no official name is known, I figured it would work well as a conjectural placeholder title.)
Proposer: vellidragon (talk)
Deadline: 21 January, 2010, 17:00
Merge Giant Ninji with Ninji
- Bloc Partier (talk) -- It is more efficient to have both on the same page.
- Lemmy Koopa Fan (talk) We merged Mega Urchin to Urchin, so why not this?
- Gamefreak75 (talk) Per all.
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Giant Ninji only appeared in one game (not includeing its remakes) and ninjis appeared in several games, it would be a good idea to merge them. Zero signing out.
Seperate Giant Shy Guy from Shy Guy
- Reversinator (talk) We have a giant everything else, so let's be consistent.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Both are considered two different species, therefore they both get different articles. And like Reversinator said, we have giant everything else, even Mario and Mega Mario.
- MarioKart66! (talk) Per Reversinator.
Comments
Well we do have a number of articles based on "Giant" versions of enemies/characters/items/etc., e.g. Giant Bowser, Giant Donkey Kong, Grand Goomba, Giant Bob-omb, Giant Blue Shell, Giant Banana, even Giant Kirby, Giant Yoshi Egg, Giant Spear Man, Giant Red Shell, Giant ? Block, Giant ! Block, Gargantua Koopa Troopa, etc, etc. --Garlic Man (talk)
- All right, all right, that's enough giant stuff. Anyways, I think that shows that Giant Shy Guy should be made. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I think that Giant Bob-omb, Giant Blue Shell, Giant Red Shell, Giant ? Block, and Giant ! Block should be merged into their respective article because most are stubs and are just giant versions of their smaller counterparts, nothing different.--FREAK ~Game Freak~ OUT!
@Zero: That's a really bad reason. There are numerous sub-species of enemies that have only appeared in one game, like Headbonk Goomba.