MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Super Luigi! (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article it's much detailed,and has artwork this must be a FA. | #{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article it's much detailed,and has artwork this must be a FA. | ||
#[[user:Super Luigi!]] i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} This article needs more images especially in the story section. No one wants to read through text without images. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} This article needs more images especially in the story section. No one wants to read through text without images. |
Revision as of 17:13, November 24, 2009
Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga
Support
- MATEOELBACAN (talk) This article it's much detailed,and has artwork this must be a FA.
- user:Super Luigi! i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article.
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This article needs more images especially in the story section. No one wants to read through text without images.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per BabyLuigiOnFire. As I scroll down the page, I only see blocks of text with a few pictures to back it up.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - I said to wait till there were images on the story part! Sorry, but images do count for featuring a article!
- Super mario fan (talk) The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - The non-gallery part of the article has two images
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) There's like no pictures almost! This is too bland!
Removal of Opposes
Comments
So you all say that the article lacks on images,huh?...Then I'll add them!--MATEOELBACAN 16:10, 13 November 2009 (EST)