MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Boo: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Support: new votes to the bottom; don't alter other people's comments...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#[[Boo]] is a good article will lots of information and not to long. {{User|RedBoo64}} | #[[Boo]] is a good article will lots of information and not to long. {{User|RedBoo64}} | ||
#[[Boo]] is a famous enemy with a page that is not too short, not too long, and it has lotsa info.{{User|GameMaster}} | #[[Boo]] is a famous enemy with a page that is not too short, not too long, and it has lotsa info.{{User|GameMaster}} | ||
#Boo should be a feature article its well writen with good pics.{{User|MarioPartyFanactic77}} | #Boo should be a feature article its well writen with good pics.{{User|MarioPartyFanactic77}} | ||
#Boo is a well written article and deserves to be feautured, He rocks! {{User|Commander Buzz}} | #Boo is a well written article and deserves to be feautured, He rocks! {{User|Commander Buzz}} | ||
#Deserves to be Featured. {{User|Dry Paratroopa}} | #Deserves to be Featured. {{User|Dry Paratroopa}} | ||
#{{User|Mario64fanatic}} Boo should be a featured article because of all the info on Boo and still being an article that's not to long to read. Also Boo is cool! | #{{User|Mario64fanatic}} Boo should be a featured article because of all the info on Boo and still being an article that's not to long to read. Also Boo is cool! | ||
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Per all. The article is good, written well. | #{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Per all. The article is good, written well. | ||
#This is a good article, contains lots of information and a decent amount of links. {{User|188seth}} | #This is a good article, contains lots of information and a decent amount of links. {{User|188seth}} | ||
| Line 30: | Line 20: | ||
# Personally I think that even though the page has a few problems, they could be easily fixed, and the article itself is great. -''Doopliss rocks'' | # Personally I think that even though the page has a few problems, they could be easily fixed, and the article itself is great. -''Doopliss rocks'' | ||
#How could you not nominate something as cute as Boo? --[[User:Commander Lightning|<font color=purple>Commander Victor Lightning</font>]] | #How could you not nominate something as cute as Boo? --[[User:Commander Lightning|<font color=purple>Commander Victor Lightning</font>]] | ||
#Why not, boo is a great character, especially in the spin-offs; Article passes FA requirements {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | #Why not, boo is a great character, especially in the spin-offs; Article passes FA requirements {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | ||
#[[Boo]] is a good article. Nuff' said. {{User|Ohforf3}} | #[[Boo]] is a good article. Nuff' said. {{User|Ohforf3}} | ||
Revision as of 16:32, October 13, 2009
Boo
Support
- Boo is a good article will lots of information and not to long. RedBoo64 (talk)
- Boo is a famous enemy with a page that is not too short, not too long, and it has lotsa info.GameMaster (talk)
- Boo should be a feature article its well writen with good pics.MarioPartyFanactic77 (talk)
- Boo is a well written article and deserves to be feautured, He rocks! Commander Buzz (talk)
- Deserves to be Featured. Dry Paratroopa (talk)
- Mario64fanatic (talk) Boo should be a featured article because of all the info on Boo and still being an article that's not to long to read. Also Boo is cool!
- Super Mario Bros. (talk) Per all. The article is good, written well.
- This is a good article, contains lots of information and a decent amount of links. 188seth (talk)
- This is an awesome article, It has lots of info and good pics.Yuiy (talk)
- Per all Marioguy1 (talk)
- Per All SpriteYoshi (talk)
- Personally I think that even though the page has a few problems, they could be easily fixed, and the article itself is great. -Doopliss rocks
- How could you not nominate something as cute as Boo? --Commander Victor Lightning
- Why not, boo is a great character, especially in the spin-offs; Article passes FA requirements Baby Mario Bloops (talk)
- Boo is a good article. Nuff' said. Ohforf3 (talk)
Oppose
- In its current state, the article is not fit to be featured. Almost every section needs some help with grammar, size, and formatting. Also, the "The Appearance of a Boo" section either needs deletion or improvement. The lead at the beginning of the article also needs major improvement. Bloc Partier (talk)
- Urm, isn't Yoshi's Island DS supposed to be near the beginning? Also Super Mario World2:Yoshi's Island doesn't say ALL the boos that appear in the game. Also NSMB section needs more work. Super mario fan (talk)
- The History section needs a lot of work Dark Lakitu 789 (talk)
- I agree with Bloc Partier. This article has a TON of errors. Just look around. DON'T SUPPORT IT JUST BECAUSE IT LOOKS LONG OR YOU JUST LIKE BOO We might end up with a featured article with too many spelling errors...Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- Oh. My. God. WWWWWHHHHHYYYYYYYYYY TTTHHHHEEEEEE HEEEEEELLLLL ARE THERE SO MANY FAN VOTES?!?!?! This is a very erroneous article with many mistakes that need to be fixed before it gets even close to being a featured article. Electrobomber (talk)
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Some parts of the history section needs a lot of work.
