MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Fine, but only until we're done thinking) |
(→Oppose) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#{{user|Tucayo}} - As 2257 said in the Ganondorf nomination page, no articles that dont belong to the Mario series should be FA's | #{{user|Tucayo}} - As 2257 said in the Ganondorf nomination page, no articles that dont belong to the Mario series should be FA's | ||
#{{user|Edofenrir}} - I really fail to see why this article should be any better than many other non-featured articles. Plus, it is a mere list of Mii's appearances in the Mario series, and it's trivia section is filled with information, that could be merged into the main article. The fact about Miyamoto (2nd trivia) isn't verified with a source. There are yet many holes to fill in that article, so no support from me (n/o to the creators). | #{{user|Edofenrir}} - I really fail to see why this article should be any better than many other non-featured articles. Plus, it is a mere list of Mii's appearances in the Mario series, and it's trivia section is filled with information, that could be merged into the main article. The fact about Miyamoto (2nd trivia) isn't verified with a source. There are yet many holes to fill in that article, so no support from me (n/o to the creators). | ||
#{{user|T.c.w7468}} - Per the above two statements. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Revision as of 18:57, October 6, 2009
Mii
Support
- Yoshario (talk) - This article is in-depth and detailed, covers all Mario-appearances, and has images to support it. I think its ready to become featured.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - The Mii article is fitting to be featured. All the sections are nice and lengthy, not too short at all (maybe the Dr. Mario & Germbuster one). I say it would be nice to have it a featured article.
- bowser jrs number 1 fan (talk)-the mii article should be a featured article its not that short and the sections are nice and lengthy but dr. mario and germ buster is a bit short.
- Lu-igi board (talk) great article but the images are mostly poor.
- Pie Shroom (talk) This article is well written and deserves to be an FA.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)Now the picture is better, I'm on for it.
- Mario64fanatic (talk) The article is well stated, for a character who is basiclly not a Mario character.
- McQueenMario (talk) - It's good now.
- Platitudinous (talk) It has all of the info I need on Miis in the Mario series.
Oppose
- Tucayo (talk) - As 2257 said in the Ganondorf nomination page, no articles that dont belong to the Mario series should be FA's
- Edofenrir (talk) - I really fail to see why this article should be any better than many other non-featured articles. Plus, it is a mere list of Mii's appearances in the Mario series, and it's trivia section is filled with information, that could be merged into the main article. The fact about Miyamoto (2nd trivia) isn't verified with a source. There are yet many holes to fill in that article, so no support from me (n/o to the creators).
- T.c.w7468 (talk) - Per the above two statements.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not Tucayo (talk)
- Well, if you recall that FAs are about the article's quality rather than its topic, it's not that ironical anymore. Time Q (talk)
- The other "first picture" was Image:Mii.png. Should it be switched to that? –Yoshario (talk)
@Marioguy1: I think Tucayo has a point here: FAs shouldn't be just extraordinary well written, they should be representative for the Marioverse, the very topic this wiki is about. I'm not saying that the whole FA nomination should be canceled because of this, but you shouldn't classify Tucayo's vote as invalid, for he at least has a point that needs to be thought about. - Edofenrir (talk)
