MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mii: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not {{user|Tucayo}}
I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not {{user|Tucayo}}
:Well, if you recall that FAs are about the article's quality rather than its topic, it's not that ironical anymore. {{User|Time Q}}

Revision as of 18:09, September 9, 2009

Mii

Support

  1. Yoshario (talk) - This article is in-depth and detailed, covers all Mario-appearances, and has images to support it. I think its ready to become featured.
  2. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - The Mii article is fitting to be featured. All the sections are nice and lengthy, not too short at all (maybe the Dr. Mario & Germbuster one). I say it would be nice to have it a featured article.
  3. bowser jrs number 1 fan (talk)-the mii article should be a featured article its not that short and the sections are nice and lengthy but dr. mario and germ buster is a bit short.
  4. Lu-igi board (talk) great article but the images are mostly poor.
  5. Pie Shroom (talk) This article is well written and deserves to be an FA.

Oppose

  1. McQueenMario (talk) - The Dr. Mario & Germ Buster section could be expanded.
  2. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Per all.

Removal of Opposes

McQueen Mario

  1. Yoshario (talk): The Dr. Mario & Germ Buster section fully covers the role of Miis in the game.
  2. Marioguy1 (talk) - I was thinking that a couple days ago! I was just afraid to say it, per Yoshario.

Comments

I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not Tucayo (talk)

Well, if you recall that FAs are about the article's quality rather than its topic, it's not that ironical anymore. Time Q (talk)