Talk:Mario/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Should that be considered canon or is it more of a spin off? {{unsigned|Huh}} | Should that be considered canon or is it more of a spin off? {{unsigned|Huh}} | ||
:[[MarioWiki:Canonicity|There is no "canon"]]. The game was officially released by Nintendo, so there's no reason it's less "canon" than other games. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 17:35, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | :[[MarioWiki:Canonicity|There is no "canon"]]. The game was officially released by Nintendo, so there's no reason it's less "canon" than other games. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 17:35, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Well the Mario RPG's are a bit different from the platformers but I get what your saying. |
Revision as of 08:23, July 21, 2009
Mario Talk
|
---|
Un-canon elements
The elements coming from the cartoons doesn't count in the video game timeline, so should I delete the part where it's said that something's happenning between Super Mario Bros. and its sequel ? Koopalmier 07:11, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
- Actually, there is no "video game timeline". The whole article should be reorganized according to this. Time Questions 07:28, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
- But, seriousely, it's obvious that there are multiples Marios in differents universes. The one from the video games, the one from the DIC cartoon trilogy, the one from the Mario anime, the one from the educative games, ect... Or else Bowser would be dead already, Mario would not have hairs, and Mario & Peach wouldn't have a romantic relationship. We should separe the vdieo games part from the cartoon part in the biography, at least, no ?
Koopalmier 08:47, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
- Of course there are many inconsistencies between the various appearances (not only in different media). That's why the section shouldn't be called "Biography" anymore, but rather "History". In this section, we can list every of Mario's appearances, no matter which form of media. Video games aren't any more canon than cartoons. Time Questions 09:27, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
Biography section.
The biography section is a mess. It treats the different forms of Mario media as though they all occur in the same continuity. Why is this? Shouldn't there be a section detailing the video game continuity, a section detailing the TV cartoon continuity, a section detailing the movie continuity, and a section detailing any other continuities? I mean, I doubt any Superman wiki page jumbles the different Superman continuities together like this, for instance. It's just sloppy. - Buddy Christ
- The organization is correct according to our guidelines. It's not a biography section, but rather a history section, and as such it should list all appearances of a character in history, no matter in which media. There's no way of making a proper "Biography" section, because even in the video game "continuity", there are dozens of inconsistencies. Plus, who says that video game appearances are part of a character's "biography", but cartoon appearances aren't? For our motivation to adopt this organization standard, please see here. Time Questions 05:41, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
Paper Mario
Should that be considered canon or is it more of a spin off?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Huh (talk).
- There is no "canon". The game was officially released by Nintendo, so there's no reason it's less "canon" than other games. Time Questions 17:35, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
Well the Mario RPG's are a bit different from the platformers but I get what your saying.