MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(met FA status requirements)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=17:58, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
|nominated=17:58, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=03:36, 6 July 2009
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.

Revision as of 06:24, July 6, 2009

Super Mario Galaxy

"Super Mario Galaxy" was nominated for featured article status at 17:58, 1 July 2009 (EDT). If the nomination does not pass by 21:58, 30 August 2009, it will be considered failed.

"Super Mario Galaxy" has met FA status requirements at 03:36, 6 July 2009, and it will become a featured article at 22:36, 12 July 2009 if unopposed.

Support

  1. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
  2. McQueenMario (talk) Per Super Mario Bros.
  3. YellowYoshi127 (talk) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
  4. This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
  5. I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still Marioguy1 (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured. Super Mario Bros. (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Super_Mario_Galaxy&oldid=589348"