MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!: Difference between revisions
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|Grandy02}}: After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know. | #{{User|Grandy02}}: After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know. | ||
#{{User|Arend}}: This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development. | #{{User|Arend}}: This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development. | ||
#[[User:MrsCrygor|MrsCrygor]] 14:53, 23 June 2009 (EDT): As I've said below, this article is as informative about the game as it gets, I learned a lot more about it through this. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== |
Revision as of 13:53, June 23, 2009
WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!
Support
- Grandy02 (talk): After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know.
- Arend (talk): This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development.
- MrsCrygor 14:53, 23 June 2009 (EDT): As I've said below, this article is as informative about the game as it gets, I learned a lot more about it through this.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --Grandy02 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... Time Questions 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --Grandy02 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
I had a good look at this article, and I'm impressed; it's as informative about the game, characters, development etc as you can get, and I'd like to see such improvements be applied to the articles about the other WarioWare games. I have one little problem though, and it's a browser thing more than anything - seems that Firefox users won't be able to see the Gold Digger picture [I tried it in Opera and IE and it works]. Although rare, I don't understand why FF does this in wikis. Nothing about the pic needs to be done though, just spilling a thought for FF users like myself. ^^;
Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready. -- MrsCrygor 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT)