MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!: Difference between revisions
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ::Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Yeah, it's a shame... it's probably because not many people played the game, and thusly can't tell if the article is FA-worthy. I think the best way to advertise your nomination would be to tell users on their talk pages about it. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 00:11, 23 June 2009 (EDT) | :::Yeah, it's a shame... it's probably because not many people played the game, and thusly can't tell if the article is FA-worthy. I think the best way to advertise your nomination would be to tell users on their talk pages about it. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 00:11, 23 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
I had a good look at this article, and I'm impressed; it's as informative about the game, characters, development etc as you can get, and I'd like to see such improvements be applied to the articles about the other WarioWare games. I have one little problem though, and it's a browser thing more than anything - seems that Firefox users won't be able to see the Gold Digger picture [I tried it in Opera and IE and it works]. Although rare, I don't understand why FF does this in wikis. Nothing about the pic needs to be done though, just spilling a thought for FF users like myself. ^^; | |||
Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready. -- [[User:MrsCrygor|MrsCrygor]] 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:30, June 23, 2009
WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!
Support
- Grandy02 (talk): After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know.
- Arend (talk): This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --Grandy02 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... Time Questions 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --Grandy02 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
I had a good look at this article, and I'm impressed; it's as informative about the game, characters, development etc as you can get, and I'd like to see such improvements be applied to the articles about the other WarioWare games. I have one little problem though, and it's a browser thing more than anything - seems that Firefox users won't be able to see the Gold Digger picture [I tried it in Opera and IE and it works]. Although rare, I don't understand why FF does this in wikis. Nothing about the pic needs to be done though, just spilling a thought for FF users like myself. ^^;
Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready. -- MrsCrygor 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
