MarioWiki talk:Affiliates: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(UP) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Umm..I think sites that have free-hosting should be allowed to affiliate. Just coz they're free, doesn't mean they're not as good. {{User:SilverYoshi95/sig}} | Umm..I think sites that have free-hosting should be allowed to affiliate. Just coz they're free, doesn't mean they're not as good. {{User:SilverYoshi95/sig}} | ||
== UP == | |||
Isnt UP an affiliate?? {{User:Tucayo/sig|ME!}} |
Revision as of 15:06, June 4, 2009
Shouldn't this be protected?Knife (talk)
yh it should shouldnt it! Mrsdaisyluigi 09:10, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
Should Links#Fansites really lead to an article about a golf course?
- 2257(Talk) 05:01, 31 December 2008 (EST)
- Rofl, thanks for saying that. It's supposed to be MarioWiki:Links. uper-Yoshi
Umm..I think sites that have free-hosting should be allowed to affiliate. Just coz they're free, doesn't mean they're not as good. —★レシイラムtalk