Talk:Koopalings: Difference between revisions
Luigifreak (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I don't really see the point in having this article if we already have ones on the individual Koopalings, seems redundant; anyone else agree? -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | I don't really see the point in having this article if we already have ones on the individual Koopalings, seems redundant; anyone else agree? -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | ||
Well, I dunno. The Koopalings page has more info on the koopalings as a group, and the other ones have different info based on the individual koopaling, so in that case, all the articles including this one is valuable to the Wiki. | |||
==Bowser Jr.== | ==Bowser Jr.== |
Revision as of 20:00, February 6, 2009
Anybody think we could use this image [1] somewhere, its assembled sprites of what the Koopalings would have looked like in Super Princess Peach. -- Sir Grodus
- Would have looked like. It's not canon because it's custom sprites. Wa TC@Y 16:12, 21 January 2007 (EST)
- That is NOT custom. It was found in the ROM.
Heirs?
How are they ALL bloody heirs? I'm fairly sure that the eldest would be the heir. That is, Ludwig. MamaWaluigi 16:28, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Who says any of them are heirs? Bowser is still in command.Knife (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
- The bloody page does. MamaWaluigi 13:59, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
- Mind your language, cursing is monitored on the wiki. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:01, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
- But that wasn't a curse. And what is wrong with cursing? Even 9-year olds do it. Although, it is an outburst of over-emotion, it's not that bad. MamaWaluigi 19:24, 22 August 2007 (EDT)
- Mind your language, cursing is monitored on the wiki. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:01, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
TV Show Names
When they're not named Von Koopa and Koopa Jr. in TAoSMB3, why do their pages say so? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:41, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
I changed the Ludwig article around; Big Mouth only had Jr. in his name in DVD features, which the article states. -- Sir Grodus
Kinda Pointless...
I don't really see the point in having this article if we already have ones on the individual Koopalings, seems redundant; anyone else agree? -- Sir Grodus
Well, I dunno. The Koopalings page has more info on the koopalings as a group, and the other ones have different info based on the individual koopaling, so in that case, all the articles including this one is valuable to the Wiki.
Bowser Jr.
He is NOT a Koopaling, they scrapped the Koopalings for him, they never appeared in a real game since Bowser Jr. popped up. ~Uniju(T-C-E)
- The Koopalings have since been used to describe all of Bowser's children, and Bowser Jr. is one of his children. My Bloody Valentine
- Bowser Jr. was never actually called a "Koopaling", and the originals where always called the "Koopalings", after Bowser Jr. appeared it seems they retconed it so that the Koopalings never existed, and that Bowser only had one kid. So it wouldn't be "Koopalings" and he would not be a "Koopaling". ~Uniju(T-C-E)
- Fine, keep him off the page. My Bloody Valentine
- I wouldn't say the Koopalings have been retconned out of existance, since there's still the ocassional referrence to them, like in Super Paper Mario, or the unused sprites in Super Princess Peach. Funny how they're referrenced in games where Bowser Jr. never appears. It's like there's two Mario Universes or sommething (JK). I know that Iggy (or was it Larry) made a brief cameo at the start of Super Mario Sunshine when FLUDD scans Mario, but that just screws things around even more. -- Booster
- Bowser Jr. was never actually called a "Koopaling", and the originals where always called the "Koopalings", after Bowser Jr. appeared it seems they retconed it so that the Koopalings never existed, and that Bowser only had one kid. So it wouldn't be "Koopalings" and he would not be a "Koopaling". ~Uniju(T-C-E)
Nintendo
What happened to Nintendo,huh?They don't wanna put the Koopalings anymore? Also Bowser Jr. isn't a Koopaling 'cause he isn't referred as one only Bowser's child. Xpike the hedgehog
It's probably just easier to use one character than seven (or eight). -- Sir Grodus 15:24, 10 December 2007 (EST)
Agreed (and go to the forums).Knife (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (EST)
Merge
Should we merge all the Koopaling article with the Koopalings article?
- No, unlike Ashley and Red, The Koopalings all have enough individual info (Different battle tactics, action in the DIC cartoon trilogy... ect.) to be worthy of their own articles.
Bowletta
Was it ever stated that the Koopalings were actually fooled into thinking she was their father? They could've just been following her orders so they weren't punished, or they could've been hypnotized (which I think is the since they curiously didn't have any lines in the game). As for whether or not Junior's a Koopaling I just say he is 'cause it's easier to talk about Bowser's kids as "the Koopalings" as opposed to "The Koopalings and Bowser Jr."; still, Nintendo hasn't said he is one so I have no problem with listing him as somewhat seperate from the original Koopalings (as he is in the article at the moment), it seems like a sensible compromise between the two views. - Walkazo
We can probably just remove that stuff about Bowletta in the trivia completely, since we don't know the actual circumstances how they came to work for her and don't want to dwelve too far into speculation. -- Sir Grodus 17:02, 5 January 2008 (EST)
Trivia
In the trivia section it shows information about single koopalings, not koopalings as a whole. For example, one of them says something like "Ludwig von koopa appears in brawl as a sticker" should we rewrite them into something like "Ludwig von koopa is the only koopaling to appear in brawl?" Luigfreak Mai talk