MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Deanna Mustard: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=15:01, 2 February 2009 (EST) | |nominated=15:01, 2 February 2009 (EST) | ||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |passed=16:20, 3 February 2009<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Stumpers}} - Per Time Q - we've voted on these rules, so we have to stand by them. | #{{User|Stumpers}} - Per Time Q - we've voted on these rules, so we have to stand by them. | ||
#{{User|Stooben Rooben}} - As fantastic as I think the article is, I have to agree with it's removal of FA status. | #{{User|Stooben Rooben}} - As fantastic as I think the article is, I have to agree with it's removal of FA status. | ||
#{{user|Bloc Partier}} - Per Stoobs. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Hmmm... The information may not be relevant, but it is certainly interesting. I don't see why we can't keep it. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 19:21, February 3, 2009
Deanna Mustard
Remove Featured Article Status
- Time Questions: While it is undoubtedly well-written, it doesn't meet the 4,000 characters criterion. After removing some of the coding (templates, categories, links section, image coding...) I count 3,303 characters. (Even without removing anything of the current code, it's only 4,026 characters.) Moreover, I'm not sure whether the "School Life and Theatrical Interest" section is really relevant to the wiki (see this proposal).
- MisterJaffffey
G0 Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Deanna Mustard: Per Time Q, plus I never really thought this looked like a good feature article. Not sure why. - Stumpers (talk) - Per Time Q - we've voted on these rules, so we have to stand by them.
- Stooben Rooben (talk) - As fantastic as I think the article is, I have to agree with it's removal of FA status.
- Bloc Partier (talk) - Per Stoobs.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
Hmmm... The information may not be relevant, but it is certainly interesting. I don't see why we can't keep it. .
