MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Geno

Geno

Support

1. Garlic Man (talk) - I read the article, and it's Brilliant. Awesomely written. I think some people might note about the short lead, but as I read the article, I could tell that they were an experienced writer. Great, informative article right here.
2. Luigi3000 (talk) - ditto. It is so good. Iwish there was more to wright!
3. Stooben Rooben (talk) - The article is adequate. However, I would like the red link to Super Star Shot to be blue.
4. Crystal Batamon (talk) - The article was very well written and compiled virtually every known thing about Geno! Well done.

Oppose

1. I really feel the History section could be a tad bit longer, also the other apperance section needs to be greatly inproved apon. Luigibros2

Comments

Stooby: Yeah, I noticed Super Star Shot as well; but I do not have the game, unfortunately, and could not write the article. But since 1 seems like a "reasonable" number of red links, I don't think it'll affect the status that much. Garlic Man (talk)

Thus why I didn't oppose. ;) I just wanted to point out that the article would look almost perfect if there weren't any red links. I haven't played it either, so I couldn't create it though. Stooben Rooben (talk)

Okay :). Also, is there any reason why you keep changing signatures into the User template in the comments section? I don't see how they would interfere here. (Although in the Supports/Opposes they can screw up the numbering at times). Garlic Man (talk)

I mainly do it because it can take some computers too long to load, particularly if the sigs have massive coding or animations in them. (Mine takes quite a while to load.) Stooben Rooben (talk)

Ah, yes. But it must take a heck of a long time to load your talk page as well, then :P. Garlic Man (talk)

I just took the link parts off of it. It's technically not a real attack. InfectedShroom (talk)