Category talk:Disambiguation: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:[[Template:About|Three or more links]] ([[Special:Diff/4389308|previously four]]) now adds the article to [[:Category:Articles with too many disambiguation links|this category]], so it would necessitate a disambiguation page with three entries at that point. The policy page is just outdated. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 05:15, February 7, 2025 (EST) | :[[Template:About|Three or more links]] ([[Special:Diff/4389308|previously four]]) now adds the article to [[:Category:Articles with too many disambiguation links|this category]], so it would necessitate a disambiguation page with three entries at that point. The policy page is just outdated. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 05:15, February 7, 2025 (EST) | ||
::It feels like half the entries in this category only have two links.--[[User:Platform|Platform]] ([[User talk:Platform|talk]]) 22:51, February 7, 2025 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:52, February 7, 2025
Should we create disambiguation pages that only link to two pages? Seems a bit minor to me.Knife (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2007 (EDT)
I agree, the articleabout template works best if its only two pages. -- Sir Grodus
A disambig page for two articles may be necessary if both topics are of relatively equal importance. -- Son of Suns
Current policy is a minimum of four pages as per proposal. Yet randomly sampling through the category shows that the majority fails to reach that requirement. It might be the mostly widely disregarded rule in this wiki. This rule might as well not exist.--Platform (talk) 04:54, February 5, 2025 (EST)
- Three or more links (previously four) now adds the article to this category, so it would necessitate a disambiguation page with three entries at that point. The policy page is just outdated.
Mario JC 05:15, February 7, 2025 (EST)
