Talk:Galoomba: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Title) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If we didn't consider this to be it's own species, this wouldn't have it's own article. Thus, the Japanese Name is better in this particular case. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 15:21, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | If we didn't consider this to be it's own species, this wouldn't have it's own article. Thus, the Japanese Name is better in this particular case. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 15:21, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Then we'd also have to move the newer Zeus Guy to its Japanese name (if the Japanese names are different). And there had to be a different template (which explains why the Japanese name is used). --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 15:28, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | :Then we'd also have to move the newer Zeus Guy to its Japanese name (if the Japanese names are different). And there had to be a different template (which explains why the Japanese name is used). --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 15:28, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
::if we don't use the Japanese name for Zeus Guy, it's because we don,t know what the hell it is (For what we know, it doesn't have one). | |||
And Frankly, there's no need to have a big, fugly, honkin' template for something as trivial as this. A trivia will do. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 15:31, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:31, October 24, 2008
Title
I think this article's title should be "Goomba (SMW)", since they are officially named Goomba in English. We also have two articles for both Zeus Guys, called "Zeus Guy (Bandit)" and "Zeus Guy (Snifit)", respectively, and don't use the Japanese name for one of them (I don't know their Japanese names, though). --Grandy02 15:03, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- Well, Yoshikart (talk) did that earlier, but then Stooben Rooben (talk) moved it back, cause he said it's foreign, but it's still official. uper-Yoshi
- However, the template tells "If you find an official name from an English source, please move the article to the correct name.". And the name "Goomba" is official in English. We don't need to use the Japanese name as the title to do distinguish this sub-species from the main species. --Grandy02 15:13, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- Well ok. I suggest we talk to Stooben to see his reason on why he moved it back. Any other comments from anyone else except us? uper-Yoshi
- The Japanese Name imply it's a different specie from the Normal Goomba, unlike the American name.
- Well ok. I suggest we talk to Stooben to see his reason on why he moved it back. Any other comments from anyone else except us? uper-Yoshi
- However, the template tells "If you find an official name from an English source, please move the article to the correct name.". And the name "Goomba" is official in English. We don't need to use the Japanese name as the title to do distinguish this sub-species from the main species. --Grandy02 15:13, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
If we didn't consider this to be it's own species, this wouldn't have it's own article. Thus, the Japanese Name is better in this particular case. --Blitzwing 15:21, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- Then we'd also have to move the newer Zeus Guy to its Japanese name (if the Japanese names are different). And there had to be a different template (which explains why the Japanese name is used). --Grandy02 15:28, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- if we don't use the Japanese name for Zeus Guy, it's because we don,t know what the hell it is (For what we know, it doesn't have one).
And Frankly, there's no need to have a big, fugly, honkin' template for something as trivial as this. A trivia will do. --Blitzwing 15:31, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
