MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/11: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive moved to MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 10: new archive) |
(archiving) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
<table style="background:#fefffe;color:black;-moz-border-radius:8px;border:2px solid black;padding:4px" width=100%><tr><td> | |||
<div class="proposal"> | |||
{| align="center" style="width: 95%; background-color: #f1f1de; border: 2px solid #996; padding: 5px; color:black" | |||
|Any proposal decided and past is archived here. Use the scroll box to see votes and comments. This page is protected to maintain the discussion as was. Please add archived proposals to the '''bottom''' of the page. | |||
|} | |||
{{MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive Template}} | |||
<div style="font-size:95%">__TOC__</div> | |||
===Siblings Template=== | |||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">COMBINE 13-0</span> | |||
I've noticed that the Siblings template, though useful, is in need of a change, notably, the fact that, on looking, one cannot actually tell which characters are, in fact, siblings. For example, Mario has two characters between him and Luigi, or on a much more dramatic scale, Dixie Kong and Tiny Kong are on complete opposite ends of the template. Some characters, like Kat and Ana, have this remedied with the word "and" in some form. My proposal, in order to clean this template up, is to do that with all characters with an unlinked 'and' between them, for example, [[Mario]] and [[Luigi]]. Naturally, this wouldn't apply to, say, the Jellyfish Sisters, as they don't have an and in their name, or to, say, Kat and Ana, who already have an and which is a part of the page name. They would be arranged alphabetically by first character's name, so it would be, say, Mario and Luigi after Baby Mario and Baby Luigi, but before Punio and Petuni. | |||
{{scroll box|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Shrikeswind}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': October 18, 2008, 20:00 | |||
====Combine==== | |||
#{{user|Shrikeswind}} Per above. | |||
#{{User|Stooben Rooben}} I had actually thought about doing this, but I was too lazy. :P Per Shrikeswind. | |||
#{{user|Dodoman}} Whoa, great idea. That'd definitely organize it a little more. | |||
#{{User|InfectedShroom}} - Per all. I don't think a proposal was necessary, however... | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - I thought about colour-coding this template a few months back, and even came up with the organizing principle; but I never proposed it because it looked bad. This idea blows mine out of the water! | |||
#{{User|Princess Grapes Butterfly}} ~Per all. | |||
#{{User|Super-Yoshi}} - Per All. This is gonna help s stay organized, too :P. | |||
#{{User|Stumpers}} - This is actually a very well done proposal, especially for a first. Anyway, this would increase the usefulness of the template, and as Walkazo showed us, is plausible and aesthetically pleasing. | |||
#{{User|Mateus 23}} - Per all. | |||
#{{User|Phailure}} - Always those little bitty things... anywho, per all. | |||
#{{User|Dom}} - Moo. That's Cow for 'per all'. | |||
#{{User|iggykoopa}} - per all. | |||
#{{User|Tucayo}} - Per all, its easier to look that way | |||
====Leave Seperate==== | |||
====Comments==== | |||
Jeez, I hope I did this right. My first proposal and I feel like an idiot doing it. Any help would be much appreciated. - {{User|Shrikeswind}} | |||
:You did a good job. ;) Kudos. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} | |||
Er... Could you link to the template, please? :') I'll go find it myself, but it would be nice for people who newly see the proposal. {{User|InfectedShroom}} | |||
:[[Template:Siblings|Here ya go]]. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} | |||
As I said in my vote, I already did the research and came up with divisions for the siblings a while ago. I saved my work, and just went through and converted it to this idea, and [[User:Walkazo/Templates|this]] is the result. If you like it, Shrikeswind, perhaps we can use it as the new Sibling's Template if (or rather, when) this proposal passes? If there's anything amiss, please tell me. - {{User|Walkazo}} | |||
:Nice template! :) It's very well organized. I might have an idea for an even more well organized version of it though. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} | |||
::I was thinking the template could look like a cross between [[Template:MP|this]], and what you have as a prototype, but the outcome wasn't real good. So, your way is definitely the better way. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} | |||
:::Thanks! I was thinking of dividing it up a bit like that too; but yeah, there were too many single siblings, one-link pairs, and small families to make it worthwhile... - {{User|Walkazo}} | |||
::::That's almost exactly what I was thinking, and no less that's a better way to do it, especially considering, for example, the Koopalings. Thank you Walkazo. {{User|Shrikeswind}} | |||
:::::My pleasure :) I love template work. - {{User|Walkazo}} | |||
::::::Should this be archived? {{User|Princess Grapes Butterfly}} | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 08:05, October 20, 2008
Siblings TemplateCOMBINE 13-0 I've noticed that the Siblings template, though useful, is in need of a change, notably, the fact that, on looking, one cannot actually tell which characters are, in fact, siblings. For example, Mario has two characters between him and Luigi, or on a much more dramatic scale, Dixie Kong and Tiny Kong are on complete opposite ends of the template. Some characters, like Kat and Ana, have this remedied with the word "and" in some form. My proposal, in order to clean this template up, is to do that with all characters with an unlinked 'and' between them, for example, Mario and Luigi. Naturally, this wouldn't apply to, say, the Jellyfish Sisters, as they don't have an and in their name, or to, say, Kat and Ana, who already have an and which is a part of the page name. They would be arranged alphabetically by first character's name, so it would be, say, Mario and Luigi after Baby Mario and Baby Luigi, but before Punio and Petuni.
|
