MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Doopliss: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
#I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured--[[User:Fantastic Mr. L|Fantastic Mr. L]] 18:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
#I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured--[[User:Fantastic Mr. L|Fantastic Mr. L]] 18:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
#I think this is written very well. It should be a Featured Article. [[User:Magitroopa|Magitroopa]]
#I think this is written very well. It should be a Featured Article. [[User:Magitroopa|Magitroopa]]
#It has  a trivia section, a powers and abilites section, a biography, etc.  Seems pretty good to me {{User|White Knight/sig}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 18:12, September 17, 2008

Doopliss

Support

  1. I know I nominated him once long ago and he got taken off the list but his artical is waaaaaay better now it has more info more Images and is very well written thus why I say this artical should be featured. Luigibros2
  2. I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured--Fantastic Mr. L 18:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
  3. I think this is written very well. It should be a Featured Article. Magitroopa
  4. It has a trivia section, a powers and abilites section, a biography, etc. Seems pretty good to me White Knight/sig (talk)

Oppose

  1. Didn't Doopliss appear in Super Mario-Kun? That should get a section here as well. Stumpers! 10:51, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

Comments

Well, one thing I noticed is that the introduction is only two sentences. FAs need good leads, so I say that the intro needs to be a paragraph at least. I didn't read the entire article, but does appear to be nice, detailed, and lengthy. WK