MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Doopliss: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#I know I nominated him once long ago and he got taken off the list but his artical is waaaaaay better now it has more info more Images and is very well written thus why I say this artical should be featured.{{User:Luigibros2/sig}} | #I know I nominated him once long ago and he got taken off the list but his artical is waaaaaay better now it has more info more Images and is very well written thus why I say this artical should be featured.{{User:Luigibros2/sig}} | ||
#I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured | #I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured--[[User:Fantastic Mr. L|Fantastic Mr. L]] 18:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== |
Revision as of 18:36, September 12, 2008
Doopliss
Support
- I know I nominated him once long ago and he got taken off the list but his artical is waaaaaay better now it has more info more Images and is very well written thus why I say this artical should be featured. Luigibros2
- I added some sentences to Doopliss' intro, perhaps now he can be a featured article. I think his article is well written and detailed, and deserves to be Featured--Fantastic Mr. L 18:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Oppose
- As White Knight said, the lead is only two sentences long, which is insufficient for a featured article.
Pikax (talk)
- Didn't Doopliss appear in Super Mario-Kun? That should get a section here as well. Stumpers! 10:51, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Comments
Well, one thing I noticed is that the introduction is only two sentences. FAs need good leads, so I say that the intro needs to be a paragraph at least. I didn't read the entire article, but does appear to be nice, detailed, and lengthy. WK