MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N/Equipment: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Power Flotzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Sparks}} Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself. | #{{User|Sparks}} Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself. | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured. | #{{User|Tails777}} Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured. | ||
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all. | |||
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== |
Revision as of 13:24, November 2, 2024
Equipment
Remove featured article status
- RickTommy (talk) 1) Unlike most other Smash-related articles, it still includes non-Mario-related stuff. 2) SSB4 hasn't been at the front of peoples' minds since Ultimate was released (and is — I'm not making this up — possibly the game to which this most applies).
Keep featured article status
- Sparks (talk) Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself.
- Tails777 (talk) Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured.
- Power Flotzo (talk) Per all.
Removal of support/oppose votes
Comments
I'm not going to vote at the moment, but I don't think the article should be unfeatured just because of having too much non-Mario coverage. Glancing at the article, I think it looks neat and detailed. Sparks (talk)