|
|
Line 36: |
Line 36: |
|
| |
|
| ==Splits & Merges== | | ==Splits & Merges== |
| ===Removal/Merging of non-Mario articles===
| |
| This sort of follows up on my Melee enemies proposal. I noticed articles like [[Leon Powalski]], [[Mei Ling]], [[Otacon]], [[Colonel Roy Campbell]], etc, of articles that have nothing to do with Mario himself, but rather created from interest of the Super Smash Bros. Series. Those characters never interact with Mario in any of his games, nor do they affect them. I say they should either be completely removed, or Merged into their respective Stage/Character articles (Character meaning Snake, Fox, etc. Stage meaning, Lylat Cruise, Shadow Moses Island, etc.) Those articles make it seem like Super Smash Bros. is secondary importance or something. (Not, of course)
| |
|
| |
|
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Garlic Man}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': August 20th, 2008, 17:00
| |
|
| |
| ====Support====
| |
| #{{User|Garlic Man}} - Once Again, Per my Proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Magikoopa67}} - I agree. This is a mario wiki, not a super smash bros. wiki.
| |
| #{{User|WikiMario}} - I say they should be completely removed from the site since this is a Super Mario Wiki.
| |
| #[[User:Luigi3000]] -Merge with the stage and all will be peaceful Per Garlic!!!!
| |
| #[[User|mariomaster10]]-since ssb has only some to do with mario i gotta agree
| |
|
| |
| ====Oppose====
| |
| #{{User|Walkazo}} - See below comments. Also, the proposal is a bit too vague about how the removals/merges will be handled, and I don't want to see any useful information scrapped.
| |
| #{{User|Stumpers}} - It would be a confusing concept, especially for new readers/contributors. No other character articles on the Wiki would also be about other characters. For example, if a user looks up Mario, he won't learn about Princess Peach's birth. However, if a user looks at Solid Snake, they would learn about Mei Ling. If a user looks up Mushroom Kingdom, they won't find information about Piranha Plants. However, if a user looks up Termina Bay, they'll learn about the turtle. This is going to not only cause confusion in the new readers, but also new contributors, meaning that experienced contributors like you, Walkazo, and me, would now have to also be on the lookout for confused people adding information about Banzai Bill to the Princess Peach's Castle article and information about Zelda to the Link article. On the other hand, if we make series articles, we can merge all of the minor subjects into one, much like we do on [[List of Implied Characters]]. In the event that a subject from the series is major, like Link, for example, we could include a short blurb and link users to Link's article (no pun intended) using the main article template. Not only does this solve the problem of whether Link, Zelda, Sheik, or Ganon will get information about Legend of Zelda content, but it also is much simpler. There's no need for a lengthy set of rules to read just to figure out where a bit of information should go and where to link the redirect pages.
| |
| #[[User: Booster|Booster]] -- Per Stumpers. At least merge the minor non-playable non-Mario characters onto their own pages or something.
| |
| #{{User|InfectedShroom}} - Per Stumpers. And my opposal in the first place.
| |
| #{{User|Pikax}} - They're all characters in their own right, therefore they should have their own articles. '''End of.'''
| |
| #{{user|tanokkitails}}-per all
| |
| #{{user|Yoshikart}}-F***! I hate this proposal. PER ALL!
| |
| #{{user|Dryest bowser}}- I agree with Stumpers 100%. it would be really confusing
| |
| #{{user|Arend}} - What Dryest bowser said. Also, if we do this, then we can remove EVERY template what has any mean with the SSB series!
| |
| #{{user|Thanos6}} - This isn't Wikipedia, we shouldn't be merging anything.
| |
| #{{user|Bob-omb buddy}} - Even if this is a mario wiki, SSBB is a mario game.
| |
| #{{User|Tucayo}} -. Per all, as a mariowiki, we must inform the most possible about mario games, including SSB
| |
| #{{user|King Mario}} - Per All
| |
|
| |
| ====Comments====
| |
| How will you decide to merge or remove the articles? I'd just split the support sections into "Remove" or "Merge". Cuz I really don't want those articles removed. :\ {{User|InfectedShroom}}
| |
|
| |
| Problem here: an article about Sonic is about the character, not the series. Same with Snake. The article is about the fictional individual rather than the series behind him. Also, that's going to create a monster of an article for characters like Samus, and how do you propose that we decide whether to deposit the Legend of Zelda series on Link, Zelda, or Ganon? The entire Pokemon series on the Pikachu, Jigglypuff, Pichu, Mewtwo, or Lucario articles? Here's a solution to that problem: series pages. We could create a page for each series that has crossed over. There could be a short blurb up top regarding when the series crossed over, and then the article would have all the content from that series that crossed over, with each character, item, etc. getting its own section. Any subject, such as a playable Super Smash Bros. character, could get a short blurb as well, with a "main article" link to their larger article. {{User|Stumpers}} 15:01, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
| :I like Stumpers' idea. In fact, I've always wondered why we don't have series pages: we might be the ''Mario'' Wiki, but it's still felt like a glaring omission. - {{User|Walkazo}}
| |
| ::I like that idea. {{User|InfectedShroom}}
| |
| :::I don't. Seems like it could easily be used as a way to shoehorn in Banjo and Conker article(s). -- {{User|Ghost Jam}}
| |
| Stumpers: I wasn't talking about the biggies (Sonic, who was in Olympic games and Brawl), but rather those characters who don't even really show up, but rather just make codec calls from somewhere, and have nothing to do with anything. Sonic and Snake and Samus and all those people can still have own articles; just not "Otacon", and those others. {{User|Garlic Man}}
| |
| :The problem is what to do with those minor characters. As Stumpers said, merging them with the main characters and the stages will result in large, unruly articles, and confuse navigation surrounding those series. Yes, the minor characters shouldn't have articles, but a better way to deal with them are series articles. - {{User|Walkazo}}
| |
|
| |
| Should I make a proposal for merging into series lists? {{User|Stumpers}} 16:30, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
| :Yeah, something like that would be great. -- [[User: Booster|Booster]]
| |
| ::Once this one ends. - {{User|Walkazo}}
| |
|
| |
| I have a feeling a bunch of people misunderstood my proposal; oh well. Anyway, could we ''at least'' merge [[Colonel Roy Campbell]], [[Mei Ling]], [[Otacon]], [[Slippy Toad]], [[Peppy Hare]], [[Krystal]] and [[Navi]] into List of Cameos? {{User|Garlic Man}}
| |
| :<big>'''NO!!!'''</big> {{user|Arend}} - well, in my opinion...
| |
| ::Wasn't the proposal about whether to merge Roy Campbell with Snake, etc.? Don't you worry, though. Based on how many people supported the series links idea, you'll probably get your wish. Here's my idea: we don't truncate the articles at all, we just merge. The original articles will then become redirects to their section on the "Metal Gear Solid" (or whatever) pages. Trust me, I know from the list of implied characters, this method works very well when implemented correctly. {{User|Stumpers}} 13:58, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Wow. Your argumentation is mind-blowing, Arend.
| |
|
| |
| I don't like the series page idea. As Ghost Jam said, it could be used to shoeorn in unrelated series. And beside, do we ''really'' need to have a page on Metal Gear because Snake happened to be in the same game as Mario? i think something among the line of "List of minor Crossover characters in Super Smash Bros" would work better. {{User|Blitzwing}}
| |
| :Or perhaps even a "List of minor Crossover characters" in general. (e.g. [[Big the Cat]] and other Refs in Mario & Sonic). {{User|Garlic Man}}
| |
|
| |
| I'd just like to say now that I object to WikiMario's vote. Yes, we are a Super Mario Wiki, not a Super Smash Bros. Wiki, but the reason we have Super Smash Bros. articles is because Mario plays a significant role in the series and even some of the minor characters from other series (such as Otacon and Slippy Toad) still have certain roles that cannot be overlooked. {{User|Pikax}}
| |
|
| |
| So let me get this straight before I vote. Stumpers, your idea is to merge articles based on the series they come from? Such as merging Pikachu, Jigglypuff, and other Pokemon themed things into one big article? I would be in for that. I see nothing wrong with unimportant Sonic articles or other Nintendo Series into one thing for each series. So like all the Mario & Sonic at the Olympic games characters and refs like Vector, knuckles, Cream and all the others would merge into one big Sonic page? {{User|Moonshine}}
| |
| :Not quite, but I'll spell it out completely when I propose the idea. For now, let me tell you what I'm thinking. First, we would create several articles about series, such as "Sonic the Hedgehog (series)," "Legend of Zelda," and "Metroid (series)." These articles would both outline the way in which the series has crossed over with the ''Super Mario'' series. Then, it would have one section for each character, location, item, etc. that has ever crossed-over with ''Super Mario''. On the "Sonic the Hedgehog" article, that would include [[Green Hill Zone]], [[Sonic the Hedgehog]], [[Big the Cat]] and others. These sections will be complete replications of the current articles. All the text from "Big the Cat" will be transfered to the "Big the Cat" section on the "Sonic the Hedgehog (series)" page. The Big the Cat page will then become a redirect to the Big the Cat section. However, major characters, such as those playable in ''Brawl'' and ''Mario & Sonic'', will keep their pages. Instead of simply copying over their entire articles for the series page, we will write a short blurb and link to the subject's main article. From there we can deside through more propsals if characters are major enough to deserve their own article, and of course if a character is wrongly merged we can easily revert the merge because no text is lost.
| |
| :For your examples: Pikachu and Jigglypuff will have their articles still because they are playable characters in ''Smash''. Palkia, Entei, and other non-playable Pokemon will be merged with "Pokemon (series)." The referies of Mario & Sonic will be merged to "Sonic the Hedgehog (series)" while Tails and Shadow retain their articles because they were playable in Mario & Sonic. If you think that "playable = article" is not a good guideline, let me know. {{User|Stumpers}} 17:41, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Alright. I see what your saying now. I like the idea. Sonic referees are indeed very minor, so yeah, those should merge. Same with Pokeball Pokemon. What about stages from brawl that come from minor franchises like Hannebow(sp?), Pictochat, and other like that? {{User|Moonshine}}
| |
| :All stages qualify for their own articles. -- [[User: Booster|Booster]]
| |
|
| |
| ::Well, from what I understand I think Stumpers means that we would merge the stages with the series pages. Such as Brige of Eldin and Termia Bay going to the new Zelda series page. That would still leave articles like Pictochat, Battlefield, and others, though. - {{User|Moonshine}}
| |
| :::Speaking from observations regarding "merge" proposals, the less that is merged, the more likely the proposal is to succeed. We don't want the ''Smash Bros.'' editors to think that we are negating the importance of their edits. For the purpose of this "experiment" I would say we should merge little cameos and references first, then step back and assess whether stages should be merged as well. Right now, I'd say not because, in a series like Mario or Zelda, we're looking at something like 8 stages, and stage articles are rather long. I think items would be merge-worthy, though. What do you think? {{User|Stumpers}} 22:55, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::::I see your point. I think right now own main concern should be items, Pokeball Pokemon, cameos, and the trophies already mentioned in the wiki. Depending on the outcome of the proposal we should then turn our attention to the stages like you said. -{{User|Moonshine}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ===E.T. Templates=== | | ===E.T. Templates=== |