MarioWiki:Appeals: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tag: Reverted
Tags: Replaced Manual revert
Line 3: Line 3:


==Cases==
==Cases==
===WaluigiMan10000===
''None at the moment.''
[[User talk:WaluigiMan10000#Last warning]]
====WaluigiMan10000====
I Don't know if this is the appeal section, though I was hoping to appeal my last warning. Generally, I'm familiar with the '</nowiki>' thing as gunk on pages that serves 0 relevant purpose. So I'm not making demands, though I was hoping if I could have the last warning removed. Thanks. Sincerely [[User:WaluigiMan10000]]
====Mario jc====
Sorry, but [[User talk:WaluigiMan10000#Identifier links|three previous times]] did I remind you about removing formatting (which still saw no explanation as to why you were doing it), and following the numerous times I notified you or issued a formal reminder for not following previous instructions or rules, at this point it seemed clear that another one wasn't going to get through to you, so this was the last straw. If you had heeded my messages from the start, it wouldn't have resulted in this last warning.
 
I'm not sure where you heard that from but the "nowiki" is absolutely not irrelevant; if it's there, it's obviously there for a reason, which you would have noticed was the case if you had checked the result of your edit after removing it.

Revision as of 04:53, July 15, 2024

This page is an appeal system for reminders, warnings, and last warnings. If you feel you have wrongly received a reminder or a warning, follow the instructions below to appeal the reminder/warning to the administrators. Please keep discussions civil.

Archived appeals can be found here. This page observes the no-signature policy.

Notes

If you feel that you have been wrongfully given a reminder and/or warning, you can have your case heard here. Please read through the "How to" and the "Rules" carefully. Please note that both the users appealing the reminder/warning and the users who issued the reminder/warning are given a chance to present the administrators with reasons to rule in their favor. However, said comments can only be edited once; this will not expand into lengthy, back-and-forth arguments such as the ones found in proposal comments and talk page discussions.

Rules

  1. No case can be heard more than once. Once a decision is made, that decision is final.
  2. If the reminder or warning you issued is overturned, do not re-add it, or it will be removed immediately, and you may be reprimanded yourself if the administrators feel it is necessary.

How to

This is an example of what your appeal should look like; improperly formatted appeals will be deleted. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the "Cases" section. Then replace the "[subject]" variables (including the squared brackets) with the proper information.

===[Your username here]===
*[Insert link to reminder/warning from your talk page]
====[Your username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was unnecessary]
====[The issuer of the warning's username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
----

Important: After posting your appeal, make sure that you use {{appeal notice}} to inform the issuer that their warning/reminder is under dispute.

Cases

None at the moment.