Talk:Family Computer: Difference between revisions
HEROWALUIGI (talk | contribs) (→Pictures: Added) Tag: Mobile edit |
(→Russia release date: does the Dendy count as official?: new section) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:::::::Just because an article is shorter than other similar, larger articles, that doesn't mean it needs to be expanded. If it has all the information it ''needs'', then it's not a stub. A short article doesn't always mean it's a stub. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 09:32, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::Just because an article is shorter than other similar, larger articles, that doesn't mean it needs to be expanded. If it has all the information it ''needs'', then it's not a stub. A short article doesn't always mean it's a stub. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 09:32, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Ok well... I could try to make a game gallery. Let me see what <b>I</b> can do!!! {{User:HEROMARIO/sig}} 09:46, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::::Ok well... I could try to make a game gallery. Let me see what <b>I</b> can do!!! {{User:HEROMARIO/sig}} 09:46, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | ||
== Russia release date: does the Dendy count as official? == | |||
As per the source, while the initial release of the Dendy: a clone of the Famicom distributed by Steepler with no association with Nintendo, later got authorization in 1994 in regards to the distribution of the Super NES and Game Boy systems in the region. However in regards to the Dendy clone consoles getting authorization, it appears this authorization was in regards to Nintendo not going after the company for distributing a clone of their system. Nintendo had no involvement with the Dendy brand even after this supposed authorization while in comparison Nintendo was involved with the distribution of Super NES and Game Boy products in cooperation with Steepler. For this reason I do not think the Dendy counts as an official release of the Famicom in Russia, even with Nintendo's authorization due to the lack of involvement on the big N's side. --[[User:Bro3256|Bro3256]] ([[User talk:Bro3256|talk]]) 12:02, June 2, 2024 (EDT) |
Revision as of 11:02, June 2, 2024
Super Famicom
If there is an article on this, should there also be one on the Super Famicom (currently a redirect)? --Grandy02 17:23, 11 April 2009 (EDT)
Separate article needed?
Is a separate article on the Famicom really needed? The Mario games for the console are mostly the same as for the NES. If someone was going to write about the various appearances of the NES/Famicom in Mario media (or are those not notable?), the two articles would become redundant since both the Famicom and NES are often found in the same game, but in different versions due to localisation. --Grandy02 13:13, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
- There weren't any of the games for Famicom (Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels is for FDS), so I guess we should make a proposal to delete (not merge) the article. SWFlash
Pictures
Is anyone in Japan? If yes please help us find pictures! [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:04, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- Pictures of what specifically? Mario JC 09:06, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- Of the games and also put more info that is why I put a “Stub”! [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:07, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- You need to give a reason if you're declaring this article as a stub. What information is it lacking? If it needs images, {{more images}} is what you'd add to the article. You might find images of the Japanese covers on the respective game's gallery pages anyway. Mario JC 09:12, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- So I need to put a good reason then I can put the STUB? [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- I'm asking you here why you're marking it as a stub. What needs to be added? Mario JC 09:22, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- 1st needs a ton of more pictures. 2nd There is not a lot of info like on the other pages!!! [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:23, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- Is that a good reason? [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:27, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- Just because an article is shorter than other similar, larger articles, that doesn't mean it needs to be expanded. If it has all the information it needs, then it's not a stub. A short article doesn't always mean it's a stub. Mario JC 09:32, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- Ok well... I could try to make a game gallery. Let me see what I can do!!! [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:46, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- 1st needs a ton of more pictures. 2nd There is not a lot of info like on the other pages!!! [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:23, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- I'm asking you here why you're marking it as a stub. What needs to be added? Mario JC 09:22, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- So I need to put a good reason then I can put the STUB? [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 09:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
- You need to give a reason if you're declaring this article as a stub. What information is it lacking? If it needs images, {{more images}} is what you'd add to the article. You might find images of the Japanese covers on the respective game's gallery pages anyway. Mario JC 09:12, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
Russia release date: does the Dendy count as official?
As per the source, while the initial release of the Dendy: a clone of the Famicom distributed by Steepler with no association with Nintendo, later got authorization in 1994 in regards to the distribution of the Super NES and Game Boy systems in the region. However in regards to the Dendy clone consoles getting authorization, it appears this authorization was in regards to Nintendo not going after the company for distributing a clone of their system. Nintendo had no involvement with the Dendy brand even after this supposed authorization while in comparison Nintendo was involved with the distribution of Super NES and Game Boy products in cooperation with Steepler. For this reason I do not think the Dendy counts as an official release of the Famicom in Russia, even with Nintendo's authorization due to the lack of involvement on the big N's side. --Bro3256 (talk) 12:02, June 2, 2024 (EDT)