MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Baby Peach: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||5}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||5}}]]===
{{Fa-archive|unfeature=yes}}
{{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}}
[[Baby Peach]] was nominated for to be unfeatured at 17:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT) and passed at 13:12, 23 May 2011
[[Baby Peach]] was nominated for to be unfeatured at 17:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT) and passed at 13:12, 23 May 2011
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====

Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024

[[]]

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Baby Peach was nominated for to be unfeatured at 17:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT) and passed at 13:12, 23 May 2011

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) While this article does a better job at providing information on Partners in Time than Baby Luigi, it still has past tense littered all over the place. Also, information for Super Mario Kun is nowhere to be found, and I'm sure that she appeared in the manga. Until we can get enough information about Baby Peach's appearance in the manga, the history section is incomplete, and we need to unfeature it.
  2. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Written in the wrong tense.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all.
  4. New Super Mario (talk) Per all
  5. Reversinator (talk) Per all

Keep Featured Article Status

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

LeftyGreenMario

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Super Mario-Kun is added.

Fawfulfury65

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Tense is fixed.

BabyLuigiOnFire

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) "Perring all". "All"'s votes are pending for removal.

New Super Mario

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Reasons are the same as BLOF.

Reversinator

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Reasons are the same as BLOF and NSM.

Comments

I completely rewrote the article for verb tense, so that issue is taken care of. I can't fix the rewrite-and-expand tag though, since I know nothing about M&L. ThirdMarioBro (talk)

Don't forget Super Mario-Kun. That can't be disregarded. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Any evidence of Baby Peach's appearance in the Super Mario-Kun series; I need to investigate this further -- and if it's true, I can't believe that it would get overlooked. I'll also address this on the related article's talkpage. MeritC (talk)
She appeared in the Partners in Time one. I judged it by the cover and she's there in the cover. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Yes, she is seen on the cover of one of the issues. By the way, I added the section for Super Maruo-Kun. DKPetey99 (talk)
I just noticed; but I think what the person who wanted this "unfeatured" was asking this: "Why aren't the full details of Baby Peach's involvement in the issue itself mentioned on the article? It needs to be shown on the article!" MeritC (talk)