Talk:Luigi Circuit (MKDD): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Uh, but the tracks in the different games are basically the same, aren't they? Thus, no need to split. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 05:52, 14 July 2008 (EDT) | Uh, but the tracks in the different games are basically the same, aren't they? Thus, no need to split. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 05:52, 14 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
They have different layouts, sure. But they are still the same race course, are they not? [[Star Hill]] appears in both ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time|Partners in Time]]'', and they have very different layouts, but do THEY have seperate articles? I didn't think so. The [[Luigi Circuit]] is there for a reason; Making seperate articles isn't entirely neccessary, especially since the original article can just be fixed in the case that it's "untidy" or "cluttered up". {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} While I AM impressed with your work on this, Mario Gamer, I still don't think they should be seperated. | They have different layouts, sure. But they are still the same race course, are they not? [[Star Hill]] appears in both ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time|Partners in Time]]'', and they have very different layouts, but do THEY have seperate articles? I didn't think so. The [[Luigi Circuit]] article is there for a reason; Making seperate articles isn't entirely neccessary, especially since the original article can just be fixed in the case that it's "untidy" or "cluttered up". {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} While I AM impressed with your work on this, Mario Gamer, I still don't think they should be seperated. | ||
Revision as of 08:30, July 14, 2008
Huh? Why is it a seperate article...? :\ My Bloody Valentine
The proposal to split the tracks was made a long time ago and was voted in favor of splitting, I volunteered to do all this and I am. It'll be all set soon. Mario Gamer 03:20, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
...Could you provide evidence, please? Like, a link to the proposal? uper-Yoshi
It was somewhere back on page 7. I brought it up in the Pipe Project thing a long time ago but no one said anything at all. So I went ahead based on that. Besides having seperate pages has a lot more pros then cons. You can have a lot more images of a track (which I plan on doing) without as much of a clutter. You can have info boxes for more organization. As I've started to do here. I'm also planning on adding more info to the pages going over shortcuts and such. Anyway, I don't expect any help from this, I'm planning on doing this all myself so all you have to do is sit back and watch. And if it's really truly a big deal, I can revert them back. But I think that this looks better then this clutter. Something that was apparently shared in that proposal.
Mario Gamer 05:15, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
Uh, but the tracks in the different games are basically the same, aren't they? Thus, no need to split. Time Questions 05:52, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
They have different layouts, sure. But they are still the same race course, are they not? Star Hill appears in both Super Mario RPG and Partners in Time, and they have very different layouts, but do THEY have seperate articles? I didn't think so. The Luigi Circuit article is there for a reason; Making seperate articles isn't entirely neccessary, especially since the original article can just be fixed in the case that it's "untidy" or "cluttered up". My Bloody Valentine While I AM impressed with your work on this, Mario Gamer, I still don't think they should be seperated.
