User talk:SuperMarioSuperShow

RE: Sourced material

Rather than going back and forth with the edits, talk it out on the talk page first, which is what you two are doing now, but continuing to revert each other's edits is edit warring. Looking at the source myself, I don't know if either of you understand Japanese and are not just Google-Translating the page (it's not always accurate, so you shouldn't entirely rely on that for translations) but the line does say that one of the pipes of New York leads to the setting of Super Mario Bros., but I agree with BubbleRevolution that, while it may imply Mario got there via said pipe, it's a loose backstory and not part of the actual plot, and I think how it is presented now on the article is fine (if anything it gives more information, with the connection to Mario Bros.). Also, "relocating to where the user thinks is a more suitable location" is not "removing" content like you keep saying. Mario JC 23:27, May 5, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks for the mediation Mario JC, an edit war is what I wanted to avoid and I accept your relocation. This raises a consistency question, if 裏設定 "background setting" is not part of the plot, should "Donkey Kong is set in New York" under the same pretext remain in the Donkey Kong plot? I'd also like to clarify, it wasn't just removing it from the section that was done but an altering of the original quote (which you seemed to have fixed) and weird (-1) (+1) edits, the second messing the grammar and made undos not possible for standard users without doing it manually. Thanks again for your time. SuperMarioSuperShow (talk) 02:50, May 6, 2023 (EDT)

As mentioned before, all that was said was its tie-in with Mario Bros. with the the pipe(s) connecting to SMB, not how or when Mario got there, so it doesn't really fit in the plot section unlike with DK, which is a straightforward "This game was set in this location" that can easily be incorporated to its plot section. Mario JC 04:21, May 6, 2023 (EDT)