Talk:Bone Twister: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Isn't it? That's how I read "non-video game media source" including "web content" - otherwise, it's simply not mentioned, which would need fixing. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 22:37, August 13, 2022 (EDT) | ::Isn't it? That's how I read "non-video game media source" including "web content" - otherwise, it's simply not mentioned, which would need fixing. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 22:37, August 13, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:::You're probably right! In that case, I feel that Nintendo-published web content should move up on the list. I'm thinking it would make sense to put it on the same tier as a Nintendo Player's Guide. Thoughts? [[User:PopeLuigi|PopeLuigi]] ([[User talk:PopeLuigi|talk]]) 23:09, August 13, 2022 (EDT) | :::You're probably right! In that case, I feel that Nintendo-published web content should move up on the list. I'm thinking it would make sense to put it on the same tier as a Nintendo Player's Guide. Thoughts? [[User:PopeLuigi|PopeLuigi]] ([[User talk:PopeLuigi|talk]]) 23:09, August 13, 2022 (EDT) | ||
::::That's probably a greater discussion, and there have been ideas about that, but I am personally cautious about putting Mario Portal ''too'' high up because of the site disclaimer: "''This content is an English translation of information intended for the Japanese market. The release date, price, specifications, etc. may differ from those of products released in your region.''" I think that's probably why it has a few rough points (mainly ''Super Mario Land 2'') and that it should mostly be for filling in Dark Horse's void. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 23:19, August 13, 2022 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:19, August 13, 2022
New name
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
The English Mario Portal has a new name for this enemy: Bone Twister. Now, I don't want to jump the gun on this one since the current name is English and has been around since 2007 (basically its only appearance barring 3D All-Stars). However, the article does use an identifier, so the newer name would be more convenient, and perhaps more technically accurate if it's not considered a Tweester. I do want to point out that web content, especially non-guide material, has the same naming priority as the trading card that this came from. I'm curious if others think this should be moved or kept. LinkTheLefty (talk) 21:01, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- Do these two sources have the same naming priority? Looking at MarioWiki:Naming, I understood "officially Nintendo-licensed" to mean "third-party." That would apply to the trading cards, but surely not to content published on Nintendo's own website, right?
- Anyway, I think it's fine to move this article to Bone Twister. PopeLuigi (talk) 22:13, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- Isn't it? That's how I read "non-video game media source" including "web content" - otherwise, it's simply not mentioned, which would need fixing. LinkTheLefty (talk) 22:37, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- You're probably right! In that case, I feel that Nintendo-published web content should move up on the list. I'm thinking it would make sense to put it on the same tier as a Nintendo Player's Guide. Thoughts? PopeLuigi (talk) 23:09, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- That's probably a greater discussion, and there have been ideas about that, but I am personally cautious about putting Mario Portal too high up because of the site disclaimer: "This content is an English translation of information intended for the Japanese market. The release date, price, specifications, etc. may differ from those of products released in your region." I think that's probably why it has a few rough points (mainly Super Mario Land 2) and that it should mostly be for filling in Dark Horse's void. LinkTheLefty (talk) 23:19, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- You're probably right! In that case, I feel that Nintendo-published web content should move up on the list. I'm thinking it would make sense to put it on the same tier as a Nintendo Player's Guide. Thoughts? PopeLuigi (talk) 23:09, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
- Isn't it? That's how I read "non-video game media source" including "web content" - otherwise, it's simply not mentioned, which would need fixing. LinkTheLefty (talk) 22:37, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
