MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Luigi: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 38: Line 38:


As for how it's set up, just refer to another character article. Daisy's page, for example, has up-to-date information, even if it's old news. It also has an order of sections which follow other pages that are in accordance.[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
As for how it's set up, just refer to another character article. Daisy's page, for example, has up-to-date information, even if it's old news. It also has an order of sections which follow other pages that are in accordance.[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:Hmm... I can only find four images that apply to your "rules." I'll get to work on them. {{User:InfectedShroom/sig}}

Revision as of 14:58, April 14, 2008

Luigi

Support

  1. Hi i'm the one who nominated this article Luigi Has to be a featured article come on he's freakin' luigi:)User:WaluigiRocks
  2. LUIGI ISN'T FEATURED EITHER?! My God! What has come to this world! MisterJaffffeyPeteyPiranhaBanana.gif G0 Featured articles/N1/Luigi
  3. If Luigi isn't Featured then the world has become sick and twisted!!!User:Byfordej/sig
  4. BLOC PARTIER. Alright, done with my revision of the article. Bring on the opposals!
  5. User:Meat Knight It's Luigi... what else do I have to say?
  6. Glitchmansig.PNG Glitchman (talk · contribs) Glitchmansig.PNG Per WaluigiRocks and Jaffffey.

Oppose

  1. Fixitup Some sections seem mis-placed, some art is bad quality, and it isn't arranged in the same manner as many other articles are.

Comments

I think this article need perhaps an image of Luigi in Hotel Mario and maybe less red link. Other than that, it's definitely a good article. MUCH better than what it was two months ago. --Blitzwing 07:16, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

Uh, just as a side-note... there are Quote Pages, per this proposal. So... Before completley deleting all those perfectly good quotes, make a quote page. BLOC PARTIER.

Many of Luigi's quotes have been moved to extra pages, so do you still have any reason to oppose, Toadette? Time Questions 06:18, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

Hmm... I'm gonna look over this page really well before I vote. Supposedly it's better, but I'll make sure. :P BLOC PARTIER.

Done revising. Looks good to me. BLOC PARTIER.

Fixitup, you should be more specific and give examples. I think your statements don't really help the supporters to improve the article. Which sections are misplaced, which images are of bad quality, and what exactly should be arranged in a different way? Time Questions 15:31, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

Other than pointing out what images are of bad quality, I will easily do everything else you suggested. Why though? Right? Well you see, if I were to have to point out the images, that would show how useless they even are. So, I think it's safe to say anyone on here should know what a bad image is... You know what, they probably don't so here's some examples:

  • 1. Is the image cropped from an original version?
  • 2. Does the image contain a site logo?
  • 3. Is the image altered from it's original size?
  • 4. Is the image blotchy blurry, or just plain bad looking?
  • 5. Is the image placed somewhere in the article where it overlaps a heading, another, image, or text that is off alignment?

Those all are great examples of the images found on the Luigi article. (All of these include screen-shots and artwork)

As for how it's set up, just refer to another character article. Daisy's page, for example, has up-to-date information, even if it's old news. It also has an order of sections which follow other pages that are in accordance.Fixitup

Hmm... I can only find four images that apply to your "rules." I'll get to work on them. BLOC PARTIER.