From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
|
Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| #{{User:Time Q/sig}}: They're all officially named and major enough to have their own articles. Appearance, stats, and maybe some trivia make enough info for an article. | | #{{User:Time Q/sig}}: They're all officially named and major enough to have their own articles. Appearance, stats, and maybe some trivia make enough info for an article. |
|
| |
|
| #[[User:RedFire Mario]]: They're different things so they have to be seperate | | #[[User:RedFire Mario|RedFire Mario]]: They're different things so they have to be seperate |
|
| |
|
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
Revision as of 02:48, April 14, 2008
Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done.
- Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!"
- "Vote" periods last for one week.
- All past proposals are archived.
|
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~).
How To
- Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument.
- Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at:
- Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm)
- Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm)
- Sunday: 15:00 (3pm)
- Every vote should have a reason accompanying it.
- At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has no merit or was cast in bad faith. However, there must be strong reasons supporting the invalidation.
- "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line.
- At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community.
- Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
- All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a sysop, the proposer can ask for that help.
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights).
So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours.
Also,
NO PROPOSALS ABOUT HAVING BANJO AND CONKER ARTICLES -The Management.
CURRENTLY: 06:53, 7 September 2024 (EDT)
New Features
None at the moment.
Removals
None at the moment.
Splits & Merges
Mario Kart DS Karts
So I've been reading through the after-mentioned articles, and I've noticed that they all read something like "The [insert name here] is [insert character here]'s [availability] kart in Mario Kart DS. [Describes appearance here]. [Describes stats here]." So I propose that we merge these into character aticles such as "Mario's Karts in Mario Kart DS" or something shorter to that effect. Opinions?
Proposer: huntercrunch
Deadline: April 20, 2008, 15:00
Merge Kart articles
- huntercrunch My reasons are given above.
Keep articles seperate
- Time Questions: They're all officially named and major enough to have their own articles. Appearance, stats, and maybe some trivia make enough info for an article.
- RedFire Mario: They're different things so they have to be seperate
Changes
None at the moment.
Miscellaneous
None at the moment.
|