Template talk:Game infobox

Adding "sales" to infobox

I think it would be a good idea to add global or regional sales of a game to this infobox. It's use would be optional, but it would be good because not all articles have sales infomation. Does anyone agree?

Shokora (talk · edits)

Make a TTP if you feel it is necessary PTR (trivialWarlord)

I think sales should go in the reception section/the opening paragraph like on Super Mario Galaxy personally. Raven Effect (talk)

TTP (adding sales in the infobox)

Template:SettledTPP Template:ProposalOutcome Hi everyone! I'm proposing to add 'sales' as a parameter to the {{Infobox}} template. As I said above, it would be necessary because often this information is overlooked, and if it was added to the infobox, it would push users to fill it. Responding to a comment above, yes, the info can go elsewhere on an article, but wouldn't it be better to collect it in the infobox?

Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: June 21, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support (add parameter)

1. YoshiKong (talk) Per my proposal.

Oppose (leave infobox as it is)

1. Walkazo (talk) - I feel like it'd be better to use sales as a way to try and motivate users to create full-on Reception sections: it's an easy jumping-off point, onto which more in-depth info can be added. Sales also need explanations a lot of the time, especially if there's more than one region, and that'd better suited to paragraph form, rather than just sticking the numbers in an infobox.
2. Zero777 (talk) Per Walkazo. Video games are not like movies, where the movie company gain money only at the first few weeks at the box office and then after that its the theatre's money, no, they continue to garner money.
3. Bop1996 (talk) Per Walkazo.
4. Raven Effect (talk) Per Walkazo.
5. Commander Code-8 (talk) The amount of sales for a game is something that needs an explanation,e.g. why Super Mario RPG didn't have a huge amount of sales despite being well-reviewed is something that warrants it's on explanation, putting a simple number in the infobox won't do much.
6. Mario4Ever (talk) Per Walkazo.
7. MarioSmasher (talk) I cannot explain my total disappointment about this. We cannot treat games like movies!
8. Vommack (talk) Per Walkazo.
9. Jazama (talk) Per all
10. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per Walkazo.

Comments

Thank you to everyone for giving their honest opinions. In retrospect, my proposal does seem like quite a questionable idea. --YoshiKong (talk)

Does that mean we can close up shop on this one early? Vommack (talk)

Pre-"release" releases

While Nintendo haven't gone anywhere near as hard on public betas and "Early Access" as a lot of other companies, it's not unheard of - the Mario Tennis Aces tournament/demo right now being a perfect example. Shouldn't we reflect that with an appropriate variable for this? - Reboot (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

I agree with this. We already do sorta cover demos with the Mario & Sonic Rio demo, but more coverage on demos in general is always appreciated. Ray Trace^(T|C) 17:47, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

We could group the demo release with the final release in the Release date variable. I don't see why not. 22:15, 3 June 2018 (EDT)

Honestly? The release variable is already overloaded as it is. There should probably be a separate - and collapsed by default! - variable for re-release dates, with the main "Release date" just for the first releases in any given territory. (I can't emphasise "collapsed by default" enough for that part) - Reboot (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2018 (EDT)

Request

This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Can we have a part like

• |- predecessor=
• |-Successor=
• Maybe? It would help! [-]€40 分@4¡0 (talk) 09:31, April 12, 2019 (EDT)

Hello!? [-]€40 vv@(talk · edits) 14:11, May 11, 2019 (EDT)

Old, but I think it can work. --DarkNight 18:24, September 22, 2020 (EDT)

Game-Infobox

This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Why isn't this called Template: Game-infobox and make this page a disambig page for infobox templates. The only reason I'm bringing this up is because of this. --DarkNight 18:24, September 22, 2020 (EDT)

Add a section listing languages the game is available in to the infobox

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Saturday, November 23, 2024, 13:57 GMT

I think this would be useful as sometimes this info is hard to come by (and the translation section at the bottom of the page often isn't indicative of what languages the game is offered in as game titles are usually left untranslated)

Proposer: Zachruff (talk)
Deadline: "February 26, 2022, 23:59 GMT"

Support

1. Hewer (talk) Per proposal.
2. Superstarxalien169 (talk) Per proposal.
3. Zachruff (talk) Per proposal.
4. Somethingone (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose

1. WildWario (talk) How would we add these in the infobox? If we do add them, the infobox might become too long due to some games being available in too many languages.
2. DannyTheDingo (talk) Per above.
3. LinkTheLefty (talk) I can see a boxart region toggle, but listing every language might be a bit much for the infobox. I think it would be better to have the names in other languages section expanded to cover languages that share the English title, which we already do for some articles.

Comments

This feels important enough to include, but not for the infobox. Perhaps a bulleted list of all known language releases within or below the "Names in other languages" section? However, I can see how that could sometimes be made redundant by the infobox's pre-existing area for regional releases. DingoHazel [00526] 05:57, February 12, 2022 (EST)

Re: WildWario (talk) I mean we already have the list of release date in every single region which would take up the same amount of space. Could we also not have lists in the infobox be collapseable if people think they are getting too long? Zachruff (talk) 08:52, February 12, 2022 (EST)