Category talk:Enemies: Difference between revisions
BBQ Turtle (talk | contribs) m (→Support) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#{{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} Per proposal. I don’t understand why people do this. | #{{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} Per proposal. I don’t understand why people do this. | ||
#{{User|BBQ Turtle}} Per all. | #{{User|BBQ Turtle}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Platform}} Per all. | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Revision as of 09:06, January 3, 2022
Chompy shouldn't be on the enemies page as it was no different then any ordinary Chain Chomps besides having a name-Pal101
Remove non-game enemies from this category
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, February 21, 2025, 15:33 GMT
This issue has been addressed on the list of enemies in a previous proposal, and now I plan to do the same for this category. All of the points raised in the aforementioned proposal also apply here. Hostile species from non-game media obviously don't have the game mechanics to count them as enemies, and the inclusion of antagonistic characters is stretching the definition of "enemy" way too far.
If this proposal succeeds, the articles Big bad wolf, Burokkun, Chuckie, Dino Riders, Evil dinosaur, Goomba (film species), Goomerang Brother, KKDU, Porcupinefish, Sickobratz, Stanley the Talking Fish, Sultan Pasbah, Wizenheimer, and Zangief will be removed from this page.
Proposer: ShootingStar7X (talk)
Deadline: January 6, 2022, 23:59 GMT
Support
- ShootingStar7X (talk) Per proposal.
- Waluigi Time (talk) Per this and my original proposal.
- Swallow (talk) Per proposal
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Hewer (talk) Per proposal, non-game 'enemies' can't be defined like game enemies can.
- OhoJeeOnFire (talk) Per proposal. I don’t understand why people do this.
- BBQ Turtle (talk) Per all.
- Platform (talk) Per all.
