User talk:24.67.249.0: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Wrong template) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Ok for one, chill. I don't need insults, its extremely immature and uncalled for. Two, the account was made before the edits. I forgot to use it when editing. I'll let this go I suppose, despite it being misleading to people who see the page. Oh well, your call. | Ok for one, chill. I don't need insults, its extremely immature and uncalled for. Two, the account was made before the edits. I forgot to use it when editing. I'll let this go I suppose, despite it being misleading to people who see the page. Oh well, your call. | ||
{{ | {{unsigned|Doggz}} | ||
:First of all, no one insulted you. Comment was a bit snarky, but wasn't insulting. Second, most people can tell it's the same character, it's even explained as such in ''Dark Moon''. Having the speculation on the page would be even more misleading, not to mention confusing, than if it wasn't there. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:21, October 24, 2019 (EDT) | :First of all, no one insulted you. Comment was a bit snarky, but wasn't insulting. Second, most people can tell it's the same character, it's even explained as such in ''Dark Moon''. Having the speculation on the page would be even more misleading, not to mention confusing, than if it wasn't there. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:21, October 24, 2019 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:21, October 24, 2019
King Boo[edit]
Two things: 1-Subjective things like that are not allowed to be mentioned on articles, normally only things that are 100% true/confirmed by Nintendo are allowed 2-If a previous edit was undone, don't just put it back right away especially if there was a good reason.
I may not have the power to do this myself, but not complying with these could lead to you getting blocked from editing. Mario Sakuraba (talk)
It is confirmed by Nintendo simply by the fact that it isn't. I am not stating anything is confirmed im saying its unconfirmed therefore the wiki article should specify that so people don't get confused
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.67.249.0 (talk).
- If that "it's confirmed because it's NOT confirmed" idea was put into effect on the wiki, King Boo would already have had his page image replaced with a picture of a quesadilla. Your logic doesn't make sense. TheDarkStar
21:00, October 24, 2019 (EDT)
- Still, we only include confirmed information; speculation shouldn't be allowed even if it points out that it's speculation. --DeepFriedCabbage 21:06, October 24, 2019 (EDT)
- I see you now made a new user name as Doggz since you are still copying and adding the same sentences with editing war with your new account. Don't think we know it's you. Stop what you are doing. Speculation is not allowed on here. --Gamermakerguy (talk) 21:08, October 24, 2019 (EDT)
Aside from the Super Mario Sunshine appearance, all the King Boos have been the same character. There has never been more than one, his appearance in Dark Moon was because of the Dark Moon and the design carried over into Luigi's Mansion 3.
Also, yes, do log in to your Doggz account when editing. 
21:10, October 24, 2019 (EDT)
Ok for one, chill. I don't need insults, its extremely immature and uncalled for. Two, the account was made before the edits. I forgot to use it when editing. I'll let this go I suppose, despite it being misleading to people who see the page. Oh well, your call.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doggz (talk).
- First of all, no one insulted you. Comment was a bit snarky, but wasn't insulting. Second, most people can tell it's the same character, it's even explained as such in Dark Moon. Having the speculation on the page would be even more misleading, not to mention confusing, than if it wasn't there. 21:21, October 24, 2019 (EDT)
