Talk:Main Page/Archive 16: Difference between revisions
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Thanks for responding because I had trouble searching for it. {{User:Fg/sig}} | Thanks for responding because I had trouble searching for it. {{User:Fg/sig}} | ||
==Mensagem== |
Revision as of 17:32, September 24, 2007
Related Links?
Should we start adding these kind of sections into articles? XzelionETC
- Definitely. Alternatively, somethings can just be linked back to Wikipedia. -- Chris 04:13, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
Question
It's ok in events that we have more than on FA put onto FA status at the same time, instead of choosing one and shunning the other for a week, that we use the choose extension so all get the limelight? 02:52, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
- They are all FAs. One is just spotlighted every week. Just beacause K. Rool is on the main page does not mean Goomba and Yoshi are not FAs. They are listed on the FA page and in the FA category. They are all FAs. -- Son of Suns
Recently Template
Do we need this? There isn't much news normally to warrant a whole section, the sitenotice usually does fine. 05:10, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
FA Banner
The FA banner has been up since FA has been around and i made a new banner. here it is, now before i upload this, i want your opinion if this should go or the old shall stay:
Yes, I added Waluigi ......
-- WarioLoaf (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
Smash Bros. Article separations
i have noticed the Smash Bros. Info in articles such as Mario, Yoshi, and Wario are very crammed in there along with their trophy info. I was wondering if we could mabey do separate pages for SSB Mario character info. Like call for example this article title: "Wario (SSB)" , which would be strictly Super Smash Bros. related to Wario. -- WarioLoaf (talk) 22:00, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- And, you got this idea from SmashWiki, didn't you? My Bloody Valentine
- No it just looks out of place in the articles. -- WarioLoaf (talk) 22:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- This would just create more stub articles, or articles that would eventually be argued into remerging. -- Chris 23:26, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- I agree with Ghost Jam. My Bloody Valentine
- This would just create more stub articles, or articles that would eventually be argued into remerging. -- Chris 23:26, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- No it just looks out of place in the articles. -- WarioLoaf (talk) 22:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
The information does not have to be smashed (forgive me) together. We have sections for stats and in-game information in these articles - trophy info can be moved to this stats section, instead of being in the Super Smash Bros. section. That is perfectly acceptable. -- Son of Suns
Super Smash Bros Brawl Forum
Does anybody know what section should I go to SSBB forums in the MarioWiki Forums?F g
Thanks for responding because I had trouble searching for it. F g