MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Yoshi: Difference between revisions
Super Kramio (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#--{{User:Toa Waluigi/sig}} 10:22, 9 August 2007 (EDT) very well written | #--{{User:Toa Waluigi/sig}} 10:22, 9 August 2007 (EDT) very well written | ||
#--{{User:Mr.Game and Watch/sig}} 19:08, 11 August 2007 (EDT) Well this article is very complete with information and images. | #--{{User:Mr.Game and Watch/sig}} 19:08, 11 August 2007 (EDT) Well this article is very complete with information and images. | ||
Definetly. A perfect article. [[User:Super Kramio|Super Kramio]] 14:10, 28 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Revision as of 13:10, August 28, 2007
It's time. Talk:Yoshi shows PLUMs's & Knife's reviews of 19.5 and 19, passing the PAIR system. Please provide a solid reason, preferably referring to the article text itself.
Yoshi (2)
Support
- Knife (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2007 (EDT) – it is well written, why shouldn't it be the first FA again?
- Mr. Guy the Guy
Talk! - Above 
Per Knife- --Toa Waluigi 10:22, 9 August 2007 (EDT) very well written
- -- Mr.Game and Watch 19:08, 11 August 2007 (EDT) Well this article is very complete with information and images.
Definetly. A perfect article. Super Kramio 14:10, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Oppose
Comments
Er, according to MarioWiki:Featured Articles, this has expired. Shouldn't it get featured now? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:03, 12 August 2007 (EDT)
Injustice! They deleted my vote just before! -- Mr.Game and Watch 20:50, 12 August 2007 (EDT)
If you don't give reason, it WILL be delleted. Gofer
Oh... sorry... -- Mr.Game and Watch 20:56, 12 August 2007 (EDT)
I suppose it should be featured...but there's so little votes, and I feel as if there's no enthusiasm... Wa 
TC@Y 20:59, 12 August 2007 (EDT)
Well, maybe featuring it would make people enthusiast about FA again. Gofer
